Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a decreasing trend”

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 78,848 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

For free gas, due to the compressibility of pore volume, with the increase of burial depth, the in situ stress is dominant in the effective stress relative to pore pressure, resulting in the storage space of free gas gradually decreasing with the increase of burial depth, and then leading to the reduction of free gas content. In comparison to the average pore size calculation method, the analysis of the PSD reveals that the content of adsorbed gas does not exhibit a decreasing trend with the increasing burial depth.
In the current study, we measured the villus height, crypt depth and V/C of the jejunum, which in the DSS group did not significantly differ from those in the CON group; however, villus height and V/C had a decreasing trend, indicating that the DSS dose did not cause intestinal necrosis, but caused a significant decrease in BW and FITC-D and an increase in the content of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can be used as a model of intestinal inflammation for further study.
They observed the efficacy of the MPC-based CDSS in 9 patients, and the results showed that the on-target rate (Hb 10-12 g/dL) had an increasing trend and that ESA dosage had a decreasing trend, but both parameters failed to reach statistical significance.
Although the frequency of Lin – ‐Sca1 + ‐c‐Kit + (LSK) cells was slightly above normal, that of Abin1 Q478H/Q478H Lin – and Lin – ‐c‐Kit + (LK) cells was significantly decreased (Figure 3g ), and the frequencies of megakaryocyte‐erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs), granulocyte‐macrophage progenitors (GMPs), and common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) also showed a decreasing trend compared with those of the WT mice (Figure S2b , Supporting Information).
One-year mortality The 1-year mortality rate at the end of the following year in the non-rehabilitation group, one-session group, and multiple-session group was 13.64%, 12.20%, and 10.00%, respectively (P>0.05); the multiple-session group showed a decreasing trend ( Table 1 ).