Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a decreasing trend”

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 78,848 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Moreover, as the water level increases, the diffusion coefficients of CO 2 , CH 4 and C 2 H 6 all show a decreasing trend, because more and more water molecules occupy the nanopores, resulting in a reduction of the diffusion space of CO 2 , CH 4 and C 2 H 6 , and the diffusion trend is blocked, and the diffusion coefficient decreases. 3.4 Adsorption of CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , and H 2 O by the DFT viewpoint In order to deeply explore the microscopic mechanism of the influence of H 2 O on the adsorption of CO 2 , CH 4 and C 2 H 6 in quartz–calcite nanopores, the E ads values of H 2 O, CO 2 , CH 4 and C 2 H 6 on the surfaces of quartz and calcite are respectively calculated.
In the experimental ward, the relative abundance of clinically relevant pathogens, including Acinetobacter baumannii and Haemophilus influenzae, showed a decreasing trend from baseline to week 8, whereas these taxa remained relatively stable or showed slight increases in the control ward.
The EAPC and its 95% confidence interval were calculated as: EAPC = 100 × e β - 1 A positive EAPC indicates an increasing trend, a negative EAPC indicates a decreasing trend, and an EAPC that is not significantly different from zero represents a stable trend over time.
A decreasing trend in cumulative mortality following V. alginolyticus challenge was observed in fish fed LS-supplemented diets, particularly in the LS15 group, although the effect did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05).
We observed a stage-dependent redistribution of GREM1 + cells: in early-stage tumors (stage I–II), GREM1 + stromal cells were predominantly restricted to the peritumoral stroma; in stage III, these cells more frequently infiltrated the tumor parenchyma; in stage IV, infiltration of GREM1 + stromal cells showed a decreasing trend (with no statistically significant difference compared to stage III).
When HGI was analyzed as an categorical variable, patients in the highest quartile exhibited a 59.2% reduction risk of in-hospital mortality compared to those in the lowest quartile in the unadjusted model (HR 0.408, 95% CI 0.290–0.575; p < 0.001), which reduced to 53.5% in the partially adjusted model (HR 0.465, 95% CI 0.327–0.660; p < 0.001) and 48.9% in the fully adjusted model (HR 0.511, 95% CI 0.343–0.762; p < 0.001), with a decreasing trend in mortality risk as HGI increased (Table 3 ).