Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a decreasing trend”

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 78,848 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In the study by Grosvenor, axial length showed a decreasing trend after age 20 years, and more specifically, subjects older than 50 years had axial length that was 0.6 mm shorter on average than the subjects aged from 20 to 29 years. 14 In our results, the hyperopic tendency in older subjects was statistically significant ( P < 0.05) even after axial length and corneal curvature were taken into account.
Reduction in serum T4 values in patients on lithium has also been reported by Emerson et al (1973) and Hullin et al (1975). When serum T3, T4 and TSH levels were compared between patients in the study and control group, there was a decreasing trend in T3 and T4 towards the lower side of the normal range in patients of study group, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Therefore, the doses of opioids may show a decreasing trend among those who are dehydrated.[ 12 ] We did not observe any significant difference in the doses of benzodiazepines and haloperidol even though it was postulated by some authors that dehydration causes accumulation of these medications and therefore a decrease in the dose of these medications has to be expected among the dehydrated patients.[ 13 ] The frequency of use and dose changes of opioids and these sedatives were similar in both groups.
Moreover, there was a decreasing trend in US per capita consumption of dietary saturated fats in 1970s-1990s (Figure 7A , open cycles) and cholesterol from mid-1940s to late 1990s (Figure 7C , open cycles), with an increasing trend in the consumption of dietary fiber from mid-1960s to the early 2000 (Figure 7E , open cycles).
However, a decreasing trend was established for both conversion to laparotomy (26% vs. 12%) and malignancy rate (10% vs. 4%) during the second half of the study (statistical significance was not reached most likely because of the result of the small number of patients in this group).