Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a decreasing trend”

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 78,848 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a decreasing trendp<0.00010.0× alphagold
an increasing trendp=0.00160.0× alphagold
Results: The preparatory online modules had a significant effect (p=0.044) on the ECL of the scenario leaders, with the CG having an increasing trend over four sessions (b=0.33, p=0.0016) and the OG having a decreasing trend over four sessions (b=-0.16, p<0.0001).
a decreasing trendP =.00030.0× alphagold
There was also no significant difference ( P =.61, I 2 =72%) between the three subgroups in mandibular plane angle changes, although the buccal subgroup (−0.22°; 95%CI, [−0.78, 0.34]; P =.03; I 2 =71%) showed a decreasing trend, the palatal (0.04°; 95%CI, [−0.31,0.39]; P =.0003; I 2 =73%) and the infrazygomatic (0.37°; 95%CI, [−0.84,1.57]; P =.009; I 2 =85%) subgroups showed an increasing trend.
a decreasing trendp = 7.2 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Additionally, the hazard ratios (HR) comparing each longer TL group to the short TL group showed a decreasing trend: HR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.68–0.90, p = 7.2 × 10 −4 ) for moderately short versus short, HR = 0.61 (95% CI 0.53–0.70, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) for slightly short versus short, HR = 0.46 (95% CI 0.40–0.52, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) for slightly long versus short, HR = 0.36 (95% CI 0.31–0.42, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) for moderately long versus short, and HR = 0.26 (95% CI 0.20–0.35, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) for long versus short.
a decreasing trendp = 8.45e-40.0× alphagold
mansoni infection detected by CCA dipsticks from the primary data ( Kayuni et al., 2020 ), our secondary analysis finds that a positive association between IS prevalence and age was observed up to the age of 11, after which there was a decreasing trend [T+: p = 8.45e-4].
an increasing trendP <0.0010.0× alphagold
a decreasing trendP = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Compared with BJT, the JST outpatient services had an increasing trend in inflation-adjusted per-visit healthcare charges (APC = 3.4%, P <0.001) and no DIT in inflation-adjusted per-visit medicine charges or physician workload ( P = 0.40 and P = 0.134, respectively), while the JST inpatient service had a decreasing trend in inflation-adjusted per-visit medicine-charges (APC = -5.2%, P = 0.015) and no DIT in inflation-adjusted per-visit healthcare charges or physician workload ( P = 0.831 and P = 0.295, respectively).