“a marginal trend toward significance”

Though the smoking showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.05) in univariate analysis, it was excluded from the final model possibly because the difference of smoking among the three groups was due to the relationship between smoking and gender, not real smoking and CAC.

The rs699947 CC-rs2010963 GG combination showed a marginal trend toward significance (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.125 to 1.021; p = 0.051).

In Model 3, the difference showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.051).

At 3 months post-surgery, BMI had no significant effect on HbA1c changes, while the type of surgical procedure demonstrated a marginal trend toward significance (P=0.052), suggesting that SG with PJB might result in greater HbA1c reduction compared to SG.

A reverse association between MHR and vitamin D levels demonstrated a marginal trend toward significance (β=-0.581, P = 0.052).

Improvements in the score for the physical health domain of the WHOQOL‐BREF in the BTX‐A group showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.0521) at 4 weeks after the injection.

Through simple logistic regression, nonadherence was correlated with palliative coping (OR 3.4; CI: 1.02-11.47; P < 0.05) and had a marginal trend toward significance with more advanced phases of stress (OR 4.7; CI: 0.99-22.51; P = 0.053).

placebo (mean =0.65 mg/L in GIK, 0.84 mg/L in placebo), with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.053).

However, this difference was statistically non-significant, although it showed a marginal trend toward significance ( P =0.055).

Additionally, a marginal trend toward significance was observed in the interaction between DEVIANT_CONDITION and HEMISPHERE [F (1,11) = 4.54, p = 0.056].

COL10A1 was also reduced after treatment, with the change in COL10A1 demonstrating a marginal trend toward significance (r = 0.29; p = 0.056) with change in height z-score over 24 weeks.

This modulatory condition made the 24-h spatial memory above chance with a marginal trend toward significance ( t (15) = 2.07, P = 0.056), but it did not differ from the spatial memory in condition 2 ( t (15) = 0.67, P = 0.51) ( Fig. 3 C,D).

Emotional suppression showed a marginal trend toward significance ( β = 0.13, p = 0.056), while cognitive reappraisal ( β = 0.03, p = 0.626) and perceived social support ( β = −0.03, p = 0.348) were not significant predictors.

The normalized tracer intensity in uveoscleral outflow was the highest at the 11 o'clock location and lowest at the 3 o'clock location, with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.0579) between these 2 clock hour locations.

Stratified analysis by gender revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in CD3+CD4+ mitochondrial lymphocyte count in male patients (p = 0.014) and a marginal trend toward significance in female patients (p = 0.058).

In addition, patients in the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil group had higher grade 3–4 radiation mucositis/esophagitis compared with patients in the weekly cisplatin group, but it only reached a marginal trend toward significance (39% versus 9%, P = 0.059).

A marginal trend toward significance was noted between IPD and AL (β = 0.078; 95% CI: −0.003 to 0.160; p = 0.059). 3.4.

RPS6KA4 , POTEM , and TYRO3 showed a marginal trend toward significance in multivariate Cox analyses ( p = 0.06, 0.06, and 0.09; HR = 0.15, 0.16, and 1.43, respectively).

Total defoliation was lower with higher Shannon’s diversity index at the plot level, but with a marginal trend toward significance ( t = -2.36, P = 0.062).

By contrast, accuracy for low‐, medium‐, and high‐similarity images did not differ from chance, although the high‐similarity condition showed a marginal trend toward significance (Mean ACC = 0.558, p = 0.0628).

Functional recovery and pain score The evaluation of postoperative functional recovery and pain relief indicated that, regarding wrist joint function,he Cooney wrist joint function score for the 3D printing group at 12 months post-surgery was higher than that of the control group, with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.067).

Exposure to trauma showed a marginal trend toward significance (B = 0.484, p = 0.069), suggesting that adolescents who had experienced any trauma were somewhat more likely to have a history of depression.

While Friends support showed a marginal trend toward significance, β = −0.23, t(79) = −1.80, p = 0.077, Family support did not uniquely contribute to the model, β = 0.02, t(79) = 0.17, p = 0.863.

In CKD 2, hemoglobin displayed a non-significant trend (β = −.6, 95% CI [−1.4, 0.1], P = .1) while age showed a marginal trend toward significance (β = .33, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.7], P = .08).

In contrast, the main effect of group showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = .080), suggesting that collaboration may have helped mitigate interference relative to individual performance.