“a marginal trend toward significance”

NAs showed a marginal trend toward significance (χ2(9)=15.20, p=0.086).

However, the interaction between training condition and school showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.087).

Additionally, memory confidence judgment accuracy (MCJA) showed a marginal trend toward significance between the two conditions, F (1, 34) = 3.05, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.08.

Variables exhibiting a marginal trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis were subsequently entered into a multivariate binary logistic regression model using a forward stepwise selection method to identify independent risk factors for post‐ischemic stroke UTI while limiting multicollinearity.

An Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression with SHAP values as the dependent variable, and ML group and P/E2 ratios as predictors showed a significant effect of the ML group (p = 0.015) and a marginal trend toward significance of the ML∗P/E2 ratio interaction (p = 0.100).

Regarding the acceptance and perceived benefits dimension, no statistically significant differences between-group mean differences were found at any of the three time points, with only a marginal trend toward significance at T1.

Employment status also showed a weak association (OR = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99–1.38, p = 0.06), indicating a marginal trend toward significance.

At the global structure level, the NCT revealed that the difference in network structure between the two groups did not reach conventional statistical significance (structure invariance test: p = 0.064), though a marginal trend toward significance was observed.

Neck circumference (OR = 0.57; p < 0.001) and daytime sleepiness (OR = 0.86; p = 0.01) were significantly associated with moderate/high OSA risk, while age showed a marginal trend toward significance.

However, some p-values exhibited a marginal trend toward significance, particularly when comparing pigs with humans lacking B. coli ASVs ( Table 3 ).

Interocular distance presents the most notable difference (t = 1.76, p = 0.089), but the p -value remains above 0.05, indicating only a marginal trend toward significance.

Notably, while APO_B (p=0.138) and sex (p=0.132) showed no significant association, glucose levels (OR=2.1, p=0.066) exhibited a marginal trend toward significance, warranting further investigation.

Sex showed a marginal trend toward significance, while age and screw length were not significant predictors.