“a numerical increasing trend”

communa , trehalose content differed markedly among populations, and showed a numerical increasing trend with latitude ( F = 14.007, p < 0.05) ( Figure 2 b).

Although the osmolality values showed a numerical increasing trend with higher sericin concentration, the differences were not statistically significant ( p ≥ 0.05, Table 1 ). 2.3.

Although, a numerical increasing trend of hatchability observed in Dman group ( P = 0.094).

Compared with the CON group, ADFI showed a numerical increasing trend in the LCTA, LPTA, and LGTA groups.

Although the leaf fresh and dry weights showed a numerical increasing trend, one-way ANOVA indicated no significant difference between the CK and CD100 groups.

Although the water-holding capacity of broiler meat did not show significant differences, it exhibited a numerical increasing trend.

Additionally, the MEN group showed a numerical increasing trend in ADG and a numerical decreasing trend in F: G ratio compared with the LEN and HEN groups, but the differences were not significant ( p > 0.05).

The incidence of fever (35.4% in Group A, 38.1% in Group B, 41.9% in Group C) and lumbago (5.4% in Group A, 11.9% in Group B, 10.8% in Group C) showed a numerical increasing trend with the aggravation of underlying disease burden, but the differences were not statistically significant ( Table 4 ). 3.5.

Among them, the methanol concentration in the MMA group was significantly higher than that in the LMA group, while no statistically significant difference was found between the HMA and MMA groups, despite a numerical increasing trend ( Figure 1B ).

In addition, PRL exhibited only a numerical increasing trend, which might be related to the short experimental period, limited sample size, or maintenance of hormonal homeostasis through self-regulation.

However, a numerical increasing trend in ZBP was documented in LD-ITI but without significant difference (28.9% vs 18.4%; P = .091) as shown in Figure C. 3.3 Comparison of QoL assessment between EMI group and ITI group 3.3.1 CHO-KLAT scores The parent proxy-reported and children self-reported CHO-KLAT scores after EMI or ITI treatment were shown in Figure D.

Although the model group exhibited a numerical increasing trend in B cell frequency compared to the normal control, and the ShL group showed a corresponding downward trend, these differences did not reach statistical significance among any of the experimental groups ( p > 0.05; Figure 5 C,D).

Although early miscarriage rates did not differ significantly among the three groups, a numerical increasing trend was observed in the PCE group.

Effect of time points Descriptive analyses of CGRP showed a numerical increasing trend of medians over time with higher values in females (Table 1 ).