Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

8,749 sentences · 8,749 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp = 0.0350.7× alphagold
Regarding the parameters related to kidney function, patients with Obesity/T2DM showed lower eGFR compared to their counterparts without T2DM ( p < 0.001) with a significant trend across the groups ( p = 0.035) (Fig. 1 ).
a significant trendP = 0.0350.7× alphagold
There was a significant trend with average hours of night work per week ( P = 0.035), but no significantly raised risks for hours worked per night, nights worked per week, average hours worked per week, cumulative years of employment, cumulative hours, time since cessation, type of occupation, age starting night shift work, or age starting in relation to first pregnancy.
a significant trendp=0.0360.7× alphagold
Although the percentage of patients who died or experienced worsening HF at 14 days was lower and the percentage of patients with myocardial ischaemia was higher in the levosimendan group, the differences did not reach statistical significance.[ 41 ] Overall, the percentage of patients meeting the primary composite endpoint criteria at 14 days was lower, albeit not significantly, with levosimendan (21.2% versus 26.2%).[ 41 ] At 6 months, the non-significant trends for death and worsening HF were supplemented by a significant trend for a lower incidence of MI in the levosimendan group between 14 days and 6 months (3.8% versus 13.8%; HR 0.261; p=0.036).[ 41 ] As a result, there was a significant treatment effect of levosimendan on the composite primary endpoint (43.7% versus 62.5%; HR 0.636; 95% CI [0.413–0.981]; p=0.041; Figu
a significant trendP = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Lanes 1 and 2 Patient 1, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 3 and 4 Patient 2, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 5 and 6 Patient 3, Normal (Void) and cancer tissue; Lanes 7 and 8 Patient 4, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 9 and 10 Patient 5, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 11 and 12 Patient 6, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lane 13, Water negative control; Lane 14, SW948 positive control. 192 RCA Macadam et al British Journal of Cancer (2000) 83(2), 188-195 (c) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign examined, there was a significant trend indicating a diminished 5-year survival in node-negative patients whose tumours co-expressed REG and PAP (Figure 5) (Chi-squared = 8.46, P = 0.037).
a significant trendp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
However, women with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 demonstrated the strongest associations, with the second lowest MAR quartile showing the highest risk (OR = 4.20, 95% CI: 1.30–13.50), followed by the lowest quartile (OR = 3.17) and third quartile (OR = 2.64), with a significant trend ( p = 0.037).
a significant trendP = .03800.8× alphagold
A positive response to CS was observed in 15 of 17 group 1 volunteers (83%), compared with just 9 of 16 volunteers in group 2 (56%), with a significantly higher frequency of IFN-γ–producing CD4 + T cells in group 1 (Figure 6 C ). Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis revealed a trend toward higher responses to CS peptides in group 1 as compared to group 2 ( P = .0517, by the Mann–Whitney test on combined groups); when assessed by peptide pool, a significant trend toward higher responses was observed in pool 1 ( P = .0380, by the Mann–Whitney test).
a significant trendp = 0.0380.8× alphagold
Condition-by-order-by-sex comparisons revealed significant interaction effects for ratings of ease of falling asleep (F (1, 17.44) = 5.15, p = 0.036) ( Table 4 ), with post hoc analysis reporting a significant trend for females in the CON condition who completed the CON condition first (mean difference = −1.202, SE = 0.348, t (38.757) = −3.449, p = 0.038).