“a statistical trend”

There was also a statistical trend (p < 0.1) between MPR values for patients with poor outcome and the deceased (Fig. 2 a–c).

Following descriptions of statistical significance refer to a p-value<0.05, and a statistical trend is considered to indicate a p-value<0.1.

Furthermore, we found a statistical trend for a difference in perceived social bonding between 7-repeat carriers and non-carriers within the alcohol condition at this alcohol dose ( p = .10) such that, as expected, carriers of the 7-repeat reported increased perceived social bonding compared to 7-absent individuals.

We demonstrated by sensitivity analyses that by removing these two studies only a statistical trend (p < 0.1) of the effect of hypnosis/guided imagery on pain at final treatment was detectable.

4D ), combined with a decreased time spent with path length in the inner zone of the test field, reaching a statistical trend (Kruskal-Wallis H test – KWH: p<0.1, corrected Mann-Whitney U test – MWU: p<0.1 only for the WT vs.

A statistical trend was defined as 0.05 > p -value < 0.1.

36 38 41 43 44 The regression test was significant at P≤0.05 in four meta-analyses (D, G, H, M) 16 37 39 42 and showed a statistical trend in another two (P≤0.10, A, L). 44 45 In five funnel plots, the contours to distinguish between areas of significance and non-significance at P=0.05 suggested missing trials in areas of non-significance (A, C, D, H, L). 16 42 44 45 46 The weighted average of asymmetry coefficients across all meta-analyses was −1.79 (−2.81 to −0.78).

In female students only, we found a statistical trend for this decline ( t = −1.70, p < .1).

Dysarthria was statistically significantly worsened at week 80 compared to baseline, whereas there was only a statistical trend (p = 0.10) for dysphagia at week 80 compared to baseline.

Parameters showing a statistical trend (defined as p < 0.1) in the univariable analysis were entered in multivariable GEE models; stepwise backward variable selection was used to derive a parsimonious model.

At 12 months, promoters in Group 3 also displayed mostly better PROM scores than detractors, however, these differences were only significant for very few PROM scores (Tables 5 and 6 : Pain intensity at 12 months), while a slightly higher number showed a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.1), e.g.

Relative to the morning group, Nap 1 start time was significantly later for the neither group ( β = 0.16, SE = 0.06, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.29], p = 0.01), with a statistical trend WWtowards a later start time observed in the evening group ( β = 0.14, SE = 0.08, 95% CI = [−0.03, 0.30], p < 0.1) (Figure S5 ).

First, univariate analyses were performed to screen for variables showing a statistical trend ( P < 0.10) between the willingness groups.

A statistical trend was considered when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

In addition, the test products also induced the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra; Figure 3 E), with PBI inducing higher levels than oleandrin when administered at the 31.3 ng/mL concentration, reaching a statistical trend when compared to pure oleandrin ( p < 0.1).

The results of the statistical analysis were considered significant if p < 0.05 and insignificant if a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) was observed.

There was a statistical trend favoring ATEs in patients with “extensive disease” (OR 5.3. p = 0.10) or elevated LDH (OR 3.4, p = 0.10), while no association was found with chemotherapy protocol (especially cisplatin vs. carboplatin, OR 2.12, p = 0.69), histology, or high blood pressure.

To identify measures independently associated with unfavorable outcome at 3 months, peak EED distance and early EED increase up to day 3, we calculated linear regression and stepwise forward inclusion multivariable logistic regression models including relevant measures showing a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) in prior univariate testing.

There was also a statistical trend for higher concentrations of N and S in RB horses than in RS horses ( P < 0.1, Table 1 ).

Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05, while a statistical trend was defined as 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.050 and a statistical trend when P ≤ 0.100.

Independent variables were selected through a two-step process: (1) variables with a statistical trend ( P < 0.1) in univariate logistic regression analysis were included as candidates; (2) additional clinically relevant factors identified from previous literature were also incorporated (e.g., duration of disease).

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05; statistical results with p < 0.001 were considered as highly significant; a statistical trend was defined as 0.05 < p < 0.10.

0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10 was considered a statistical trend, and p > 0.10 indicated no significant difference. 3 Results 3.1 Effects of kaempferol on the liver of late-laying hens As shown in Figure 2 , the liver tissue of the CON group exhibited obvious lipid vacuolization, with large and numerous vacuoles distributed in the hepatic lobules, indicating severe hepatic lipid deposition.

All factors which reached statistical significance ( P ≤ 0.05) or a statistical trend ( P ≤ 0.1) were subsequently included in combination.