“a statistical trend”

There was a statistical trend (0.05 < p < 0.10) towards higher SWD levels in males than in females ( r (37) = − 0.23; p = 0.09).

For both the ABI and the PVR, there was a statistical trend ( p < 0.10) towards better results in the intervention group compared to the control group, but the results were not statistically significantly different between the two groups during the 12 months of follow-up ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.077, respectively) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.

Post‐hoc t‐tests revealed either a significantly lower ( p < 0.05 after FDR‐correction) or a statistical trend toward lower anisotropy ( p < 0.1 after FDR correction) in patients compared to controls for all sub‐tracts confirming that anisotropy was systematically reduced in patients.

The ADHD/SUD group showed a statistical trend towards less work experience than the general SUD group (p = .10). 2.

Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05, while a statistical trend was considered when 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

A statistical trend was considered for 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

In the subliminal condition, the N1 enhancement for naked OSS compared to naked SSS only showed a statistical trend towards significance (t(18) = −1.39, p >.1).

A statistical trend was defined as a P value < 0.1 but >0.05/n.

A statistical trend was defined as 0.05<P-value <0.1, which is only described in the text and not depicted in the graphs.

A statistical trend was considered for P values ≤ 0.1.

A statistical trend was considered for P < 0.10.

Of those, 256 (79%) found only significant positive associations between R/S and well-being (including eight studies at a statistical trend level, that is, 0.05 < P < 0.10).

Differences were considered to be significant if p<0.05 and a statistical trend if p<0.1.

In the case of olive plantlets treated by foliar spray, a statistical trend towards a reduction in MDA levels compared to control plants was observed ( p < 0.1).

We also found a statistical trend (p<0.10) suggesting that having less than high school education was independently associated with failure to return for the seven-day clinic visit.

The result of a statistical test was considered significant for p < 0.050, and a statistical trend was defined as p < 0.100.

For the amplitude of the N2 ERP component the 3 × 2 repeated measurement ANOVAs with the factors tDCS (sham, anodal, cathodal) and hemifield (left, right) revealed a significant main effect of the factor tDCS at electrodes P3 [ F (1.9, 22.2) = 4.64, P < 0.05], and Pz [ F (1.9, 21.4) = 5.29, P < 0.05], and a statistical trend at electrode P4 [ F (1.5, 16.9) = 2.66, P = 0.1].

However, an interesting numerical difference supported by a statistical trend was found between sexes in the codeine containing paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg ( p = 0.10) and ibuprofen 400 mg/paracetamol 1000 mg/codeine 60 mg ( p = 0.14) groups where females score numerically higher SPI than males (Table 1 ).

Furthermore, we found a statistical trend for a difference in perceived social bonding between 7-repeat carriers and non-carriers within the alcohol condition at this alcohol dose ( p = .10) such that, as expected, carriers of the 7-repeat reported increased perceived social bonding compared to 7-absent individuals.

Following descriptions of statistical significance refer to a p-value<0.05, and a statistical trend is considered to indicate a p-value<0.1.

All parameters showing a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate regression model to identify parameters that were independently associated with unfavorable outcomes at 3 months.

Parameters reaching a statistical trend in univariate analysis (i.e., P <0.1) or of high clinical relevance were included in multivariate models.

In the latter, a statistical trend for downregulation was observed at day 10 pp (FC = −1.21, 0.05 < p < 0.1), ( Figure 5(c) and 6(c) , Table 5 ).

If a factor was showed evidence of a statistical trend at p < 0.1 in the univariate models, the variable was included in the multivariate, age-adjusted model.

At 1 h after consumption of a single dose of 600 mg, the difference in the number of circulating monocytes ( Figure 2 A) was lower than at 1 h after consuming the placebo, reaching a statistical trend ( p < 0.1), suggesting an increased trafficking of monocytes into tissue.