“a statistical trend”

In addition, the subgroup comparison for leg press and chest press showed only a statistical trend.

Despite the very small sample size ( N = 12 in the experimental group, N = 6 in the control group receiving treatment as usual), there was a statistical trend indicating the superiority of the experimental group over the control group in global cognition, mood, and behavioral symptoms.

There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs.

Albumin level showed a statistical trend toward being lower in the NOAF group.

However, in patients with LAA-stroke caused by ECAS, only a statistical trend was observed between the two groups, with no significant difference (Fig. 2 ).

Such significance index would suggest a statistical trend in this test.

A p -value of less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant, whereas a p -value between 0.05 and 0.10 indicates a statistical trend. 3.

At a statistical trend level, this was also true for individuals with reported sleep deficits (t 156 =1.71-.09; d =0.28, 95% CI −1.04 to 0.67).

At 12 weeks (T3), there was a statistical trend toward a group difference in favour of the IG, though this did not reach statistical significance (IG: mean±SD: 78.71±44.92, 95% CI: –6.44 to 167.87; CG: mean±SD: 63.36±41.62, 95% CI: 11.63 to 163.50) (see Fig. 2 ).

A statistical trend in the same direction was observed for “pessimistic thoughts” item (−0.8 ± 0.5 vs. −1.9 ± 0.4, 0.094), as well as week-8 clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) scale scores (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3, p = 0.091).

Further, a statistical trend toward a higher MEP SI 1 mV amplitude for the CHS approach was observed.

A significant difference in the MD values between the moderate TBI and control groups was noted in the left uncinate fasciculus, left posterior thalamic radiation, and left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, with a statistical trend noted in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus.

Results Increased cellular presence in soft-tissue specimens Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of soft-tissue specimens collected during surgery revealed a marked increase in cell count ( Figure 1 ): at the time of prosthesis removal, there was a statistical trend to elevated cell counts at 316.2 cells per mm 2 (SEM 49.81 (95% CI 212.0 to 420.5)) compared to the control group at 166.4 cells per mm 2 (SEM 30.22 (95% CI 102.9 to 229.9); p = 0.140, Kruskal-Wallis test).

We also noted a statistical trend toward an association between higher B 12 levels and higher MKX gene methylation in the NED group ( q = 0.02).

As a proof of concept study, we analysed the MMP11 plasma levels in the NMRI (nu/nu) tumor-free healthy mice and in the NMRI (nu/nu) mice bearing subcutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenograft tumors and found a statistical trend toward increased MMP11 levels in the tumor-bearing mice (Figure S6D).

2022 ) or only a statistical trend ( Doradzińska and Bola 2023 ).

However, there was a statistical trend favouring those patients who were evaluated more than 1 year postoperatively.

Of note, we found a continuous and progressive risk of mortality with a statistical trend between 30 days and 12 months (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.93 to 3.37; Figure 1 ), which is similar to what has been observed in PCI populations.

To counteract this impersonality, each discussion of a statistical trend has been accompanied by one or two cases that demonstrate how the trend actually played out in people’s everyday lives and deaths.

Differences among the groups were considered significant when p-value < 0.05 while p-values ranging from 0.05 to 0.10 was denoted as a statistical trend since they were also biologically relevant, as previously demonstrated [ 29 ].

This observation is consistent with a statistical trend of baseline differences in neurological symptoms, as measured by the UPDRS.

The behavioral analysis revealed a statistical trend, as participants in the testosterone group tended to accept a greater number of unfair offers than participants in the placebo group, irrespectively of gender.

2011), where p < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance and p < 0.10 was taken to indicate a statistical trend.

However, there was a statistical trend for a positive correlation between the proportion of close bouts by visual assessment (number normalized to the lowest number possible for each pair) and the strength of cross-correlations ( r = 0.444; n = 18; p = 0.065).

Consistently, even though no patients were diagnosed with definite PNS, those who had a diagnosis of probable/possible PNS had a statistical trend favoring the presence of an underlying teratoma when compared to non-PNS patients.