At the level of a statistical trend, the rational method of decision-making in the “Rational - Intuitive” questionnaire is lower (average values 14.3 and 13.0; significance level of differences 0.05).
← all phrases
“a statistical trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The group treated with thermal water showed a statistical trend towards lower nasal resistances and significantly greater improvements in the number of ciliated cells and nasal endoscopy results after 1 month, but the olfactory threshold was significantly higher in the group treated with the isotonic saline solution.
For all analysis, p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant and p-values between 0.05-0.1 were considered as a statistical trend.
GRS APOE (OR = 1.94; CI = 1.38–2.72; p = 0.07) and pathway‐GRSs inflammation (OR = 1.28; CI = 1.01–2.62; p = 0.07) showed a statistical trend in these groups. 3.5.
Statistical significance was assumed for a P -value of <0.05, while values in the range of 0.05≤ P <0.10 were considered as indicating a statistical trend.
Analysis plan Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Version 29.0.0.0) with statistical significance set at p < 0.05, and p < 0.10 considered a statistical trend for predicted effects only.
48 – 50 A recent systematic review 51 indicated that multiple HVLA thrusts delivered over several treatment sessions resulted in a statistical trend towards improving pain pressure scores and self-report levels of pain. 52 Further, a single treatment session, which involved multiple osteopathic and manipulative techniques, immediately reduced self-reported pain relative to a control group in patients with acute LAS. 53 Similarly, studies that used multiple manipulative techniques 54 , 55 delivered over several treatment sessions reported significant improvements in pain outcome measures.
Phase II trials in melanoma demonstrate dose-dependent responsiveness In a Phase II dose-finding study of ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma, responses were noted in a dose-dependent fashion when ipilimumab was dosed at 0.3 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and analyzed using a statistical trend test. 26 Ipilimumab was noted to be clinically active at doses of 3 mg/kg and higher.
A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a p -value between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered to indicate a statistical trend.
Moderation by variability in sleep onset Variability in sleep onset moderated associations between morningness – eveningness and externalizing behavior, internalizing symptoms, positive affect, and physical health at the level of a statistical trend or higher ( Table 3 ).
Results revealed that the interaction effect between tributyrin and LPS challenge was not significant ( p = 0.066) but showed a statistical trend.
7.7% grade 3–5 toxicities, P=0.08), but only with a statistical trend.
The Dyskinesia Rating Scale showed progression in both groups, with a statistical trend in the rTMS group’s objective evaluation of the right arm and drinking.
Furthermore, though not statistically significant, there was a statistical trend toward greater benefit with the LFD over the MD for improvements in GAD‐7 and IBS‐QoL scores.
Although several nonsignificant outcomes showed point estimates in the direction of benefit for culturally adapted CBT, these patterns should be interpreted cautiously and do not constitute evidence of a statistical trend.
A statistical trend was found for the preoperative diagnosis; patients with radiculopathy had a subsidence rate of 57.9% (11 of 19), compared to 31.4% (16 of 51) in those with myelopathy ( p = 0.056).
Statistical significance was set at α<.05 and α between .05 and .10 was considered as a statistical trend level for all calculations.
Accordingly, results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, and results at p < 0.1 were interpreted as showing a statistical trend.
AMD3100 increased IL-8 secretion and reduced MCP-1 and IL-6 secretion, although these effects did not reach statistical significance and instead showed a statistical trend ( Fig. 1 C ) .
A p ‐value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance, while a p ‐value between 0.05 and 0.1 suggested a statistical trend.
Thus, there seems to be a statistical trend in which IPV-supporting behaviors encourage the use of public help services instead of going to the police.
Comparing the renal parameters before the fourth course and a year after therapy, we noticed a GFR decrease at a statistical trend level.
Three cemeteries per segment were selected, because a statistical trend was observed using this number.
In contrast, tumor thickness and lesion enhancement showed only a statistical trend, with p-values greater than 0.05.
A P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P -values <0.1 were considered to indicate a statistical trend.