“a statistical trend”

GRS APOE (OR = 1.94; CI = 1.38–2.72; p = 0.07) and pathway‐GRSs inflammation (OR = 1.28; CI = 1.01–2.62; p = 0.07) showed a statistical trend in these groups. 3.5.

NAA levels in M1 showed a statistical trend between concussed and control athletes.

These results indicate only differences for less stringent cutoffs (i.e., 25th and 16th percentile) and a statistical trend toward differences in participants who later progressed to AD dementia to be located in the critical dark gray area compared to individuals who remained healthy, for the 10th percentile (see Table 3 ).

These findings were consistent with the intra-group analyses, which showed a statistical trend of improvement and a great size effect after the probiotic intervention, in this younger age group and for both diagnoses.

Furthermore, a statistical trend was established from analyzing our data regarding the tumor's histological type and the concordance of fMRI and DCS findings.

Analysis plan Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Version 29.0.0.0) with statistical significance set at p < 0.05, and p < 0.10 considered a statistical trend for predicted effects only.

Results Firstly, group contrasts of two big samples of patients with tinnitus (n = 231) and healthy controls (n = 120) revealed significant differences in short-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI), intra-cortical facilitation (ICF; with a statistical trend), and cortical silent period (CSP).

A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a p -value between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered to indicate a statistical trend.

After this adjustment, the previously significant differences for hypertension before malignancy and hypertension during follow-up became non-significant, although they remained at the level of a statistical trend. 3.3.

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, while results with p -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were deemed to indicate a statistical trend. 3.

Moderation by variability in sleep onset Variability in sleep onset moderated associations between morningness – eveningness and externalizing behavior, internalizing symptoms, positive affect, and physical health at the level of a statistical trend or higher ( Table 3 ).

Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 (FDR-adjusted), while P < 0.1 was considered a statistical trend in recognition of the study’s exploratory design and small sample size.

7.7% grade 3–5 toxicities, P=0.08), but only with a statistical trend.

In order to reveal a statistical trend for PLR and CLI a Jonckheere-Terpstra test was performed.

The collective test of model coefficients for the last of these explanatory variables showed results at a level indicating a statistical trend.

The Dyskinesia Rating Scale showed progression in both groups, with a statistical trend in the rTMS group’s objective evaluation of the right arm and drinking.

In the observed cases analysis (no values imputed or carried forward), a statistical trend was observed towards an improvement of kidney function in patients receiving a reduced Tac dose regimen ( Table 2 ).

Most of the baseline characteristics and outcome analyses did not yield statistically significant results, although there was a statistical trend towards a difference.

In the jejunum (Figure 2 ), we observed significant increased levels of the NAE, N ‐stearoyl‐ethanolamine (SEA), and of oleic acid (OA) in FTD mice, while for 2‐OG and AA the increases showed only a statistical trend.

In spite of these limitations, we still observed a statistical trend, which suggested that vertebroplasty was more effective than sham treatment.

A group by time interaction effect with P < .10 indicated a statistical trend strongly toward significance 22 and this interaction effect reflects differential perioperative trajectories between crystalloid groups, rather than isolated postoperative differences.

No statistically significant difference was found in patients with KL score of 2, though there was a statistical trend to increased extrusion.

A p -value less than 0.05 indicates a significant difference, whereas a p -value between 0.05 and 0.10 indicates a statistical trend.

Although none of these proved to be statistically significant, a statistical trend was described in association with age (Table 4 ).

At the end of the 8-week follow-up period, a statistical trend for change in body fat percentage between groups was evident with a greater reduction in body fat noted for the grain bar group as compared to the peanut group (−1.6 ± 0.5% and −0.5 ± 0.3% respectively, p = 0.089) (Table 2 ).