“a statistical trend”

29 In the present study, a statistical trend toward lower efficacy of the similar-risperidone in comparison to the brand-risperidone was observed.

Results on a level of 0.05 < p < 0.1 were interpreted as a statistical trend. 3.

For all the employed tests, a p -value < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance, while values between 0.05 and 0.10 were assumed to indicate a statistical trend towards significance.

The control participants showed a statistical trend of the responses as a function of imagined gravity similar to that of the astronauts.

Neural activity in the left anterior insula was recruited specifically during personal relevance as distinguished from reward, whereas we observed a statistical trend concerning the differentiation between high and low personal relevance in the right anterior insula.

A value of p < 0.10 was considered a statistical trend.

Although the association between BMI and FMT uptake in the dorsal caudate was not significant upon correction for age and sex, the association fell within the range of a statistical trend.

KM estimation revealed a statistical trend of different OS between three group, however, significance was not reached (Fig. 3 A, p = 0.067).

Statistical results with P values between 0.05 and 0.1 are described as a statistical trend.

Follow-up t tests showed that healthy controls had significantly lower CRP concentrations or a statistical trend towards lower CRP concentrations than the MDD, BD, and SZA subgroups.

We also found a statistical trend for cosleeping fathers to be less likely to have sex with their partners on a weekly basis compared to solitary sleeping fathers.

Regarding legume intake, there was a statistical trend for lower weekly consumption in HFI patients compared to the healthy control subjects (2.04 times weekly [0.65–7] in healthy controls and 1.17 times weekly [0.87–4.38] in HFI patients; p = 0.054). 3.4.

At a statistical trend level, this was also true for individuals with reported sleep deficits (t 156 =1.71-.09; d =0.28, 95% CI −1.04 to 0.67).

Not surprisingly, there was a statistical trend toward higher frequencies of CD34 + cells in TF patients compared to CR patients in diagnostic BM specimens (48.9%, range: 7.9–76.6% versus 9.9%, range: 4.5–89.7%; p = 0.07), although there was a high degree of inter-patient variability.

No relationship was observed between TKI and HT, although it was identified a statistical trend with nilotinib (Table 2 ).

A reduction in inhibitory drive to the middle population was observed with a statistical trend.

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, while a statistical trend was considered for 0.05 < P < 0.1. 3 Results The only difference between diet formulations was the level of rice substitution with LP.

Insulin-R: Ethanol had a statistical trend effect on pYpY1162/1163 -Insulin-R.

There was also a statistical trend towards lower FMRP levels in the FXS + ASD subgroup with mild + moderate ID when compared with FXS-only with mild + moderate ID (N = 5, 3.3 ± 1.4 versus N = 10, 6.1 ± 4.3; p = 0.075, Welch’s t -test), but no differences when groups with severe ID with and without ASD were compared.

It is also important to note that when DD was included in the model, the interaction between sensitization and time on zBMI was reduced to a statistical trend.

In addition, a statistical trend was observed in the lung tissue with higher protein FSR in the low-active mice when compared to high-active mice.

The purpose of this work is to show how the NO 2 levels have changed in absolute terms during the last two decades, rather than to perform a statistical trend study.

A statistical trend towards elevated DN B cells was observed for OZA-treated patients.

This revealed that the groups were not significantly different from each other ( t (9.391) = 1.749, P = 0.11, d = 0.88, η p 2 = 0.246), but suggested a statistical trend.

A statistical trend in favor of this decrease was observed in patients not previously treated with TDF at baseline (−10 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in TDF treated patients at baseline vs −15 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively; P = .07).