Barely Significant
← all phrases

a trend level of significance

83 sentences · 83 papers · 151 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins, posted since

In the literature

a trend level of significancep < 0.0010.0× alphagold
There were no significant interactions of diagnosis with any of the metabolic hormones at a whole brain level or in the food region or DMN SVC, however, there were several interactive effects that reached a trend level of significance ( p < 0.001 uncorrected, k > 100) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).
a trend level of significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
However, patients with PD showed increased RD values compared to HC subjects with a trend level of significance ( p = 0.05 TFCE-corrected), located in clusters including the anterior corona radiata (frontal lobe WM), genu of the corpus callosum, and body of the corpus callosum in the left hemisphere, and the frontal WM in the right hemisphere.
a trend level of significanceP =0.0551.1× alphagold
By cotransfecting human SRY (encoded on the male Y chromosome), the efficiency of the 420M9-1395 intronic region to drive transcription was reduced by around 15% ( Figure 5 ), and the combination of both SRY and the novel haplotype further reduced expression over wild type at a trend level of significance ( t =1.7675, df=9, P =0.055).
a trend level of significanceP =.061.2× alphagold
However, the combined frequency-duration deviant showed a group effect that reached a trend level of significance [F(1,94) =3.56; P =.06], which appeared to be based on electrode FCz only, where patients scored significantly lower P3a amplitude than controls [F(1,94)=4.77; P =.03].
a trend level of significanceP = 0.0651.3× alphagold
A two-way (timing × word emotion) repeated measures ANOVA on word attentional bias scores revealed that the main effect of timing showed a trend level of significance { F (1, 23) = 3.756, P = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.140}, whereas neither the main effect of word emotion { F (1, 23) = 1.084, P = 0.309, η p 2 = 0.045} nor the interaction { F (1, 23) = 1.958, P = 0.175, η p 2 = 0.078} was significant.
a trend level of significancep = .0691.4× alphagold
Also in the final model, baseline abstinence ( p = .013) and treatment ( p = .069, a trend level of significance) were associated with greater retention Discussion This analysis of self-reported baseline criminal justice status upon entry into a randomized controlled trial of web-based addiction treatment indicated several notable findings: compared to participants with no reported CJS involvement, those mandated or recommended to treatment by CJS authorities were younger, more likely to be male, and more cannabis-involved.