“a trend toward significance”

Baseline operational performance (T1) showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.096), with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.67).

However, in the multiple model, neither CA nor MO reached significance, although MO showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.096).

Age of seizure onset was not statistically significant in the multivariable model ( p = 0.168) The DTI-ALPS index showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.096) but did not remain statistically significant after adjusting for clinical covariates. 4.

The results of the repeated measure MANOVA revealed an overall effect of practice ( F (56, 1297.47) = 2.86, p < 0.001) and group ( F (4, 21) = 8.80, p < 0.001) and a trend toward significance in the Practice∗Group interaction ( F (56, 1297.47) = 1.26, p = 0.096).

There was a trend toward significance for the interaction between SAA+ status and the CSF p‐tau/Aβ42 ratio ( β = 0.032, standard error = 0.019, P = 0.096). 3.5.

A trend toward significance for Solution Style was also found [F (1,29) = 2.39, p = 0.096].

There was also a trend toward significance ( p = .096) for the following question: “Did you experience any cold symptoms today?” Subjects in the placebo group reported yes to this question on 3.9 ± 0.2 days compared to 2.4 ± 0.2 (insoluble BG) and 2.2 ± 0.6 (soluble BG).

We observed a trend toward significance when comparing response curves by epilepsy syndrome ( p = 0.096) (Figure 1C ), with greater persistence in patients with FE.

Results After the policy change, the overall vein center EHIT rate decreased from 2.6% to 1.5%, with a trend toward significance ( P = .096).

DSS showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.096).

However, the relation of Ned and “Social Orientation” did only show a trend toward significance [ t (21.57) = 1.34, p = 0.096, d = 0.53].

molitor being the only FA to show a trend toward significance ( P = 0.096) between defatted meals and other products.

The results from this study indicated no significance difference in early to advanced decomposition across BMI categories ( p = 0.131), although a trend toward significance emerged when comparing obese who had longer time to reach skeletonization as compared to non-obese individuals ( p = 0.096).

Notably, the number of SAE/patient shows a trend toward significance with more SAE in the treatment group (p=0.096).

However, cardiac events in the CAD group increased with a trend toward significance ( P = 0.096).

In the multivariable analysis adjusted for other covariates (as described above), there was a trend toward significance for the interaction between the TyG index and rs147647315 risk allele possession (β = –7.50, P = 0.096).

A trend toward significance was observed between FOXO1 expression and low sTIL density ( p = 0.096), and negative lymph node status ( p = 0.055).

Female sex was also associated with lower MIBS-4 scores (β = -1.49, p = 0.057), and longer disease duration showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.096).

There was a trend toward significance between absence of minor allele for rs1800795 and IL6 milk concentration among Caucasians at week 3 ( P = .0966, ω p 2 = 0.1002) ( Table 3 ; Figure 5 ).

A trend toward significance was also observed between the moderate and severe groups ( P = 0.0968) ( Fig 1 ).

The 2000 Hz variable showed a trend toward significance (OR = 0.84; p = 0.097) but did not meet the predefined threshold for statistical significance.

Furthermore, a Pearson chi-square test on data captured post intervention showed a trend toward significance ( χ 2 4) =7.852; P =.097), indicating that group membership and monitoring adherence were associated.

In a GLM analysis ( F = 4.2, p = 0.008 for overall model) with terms for Sex , D6Mit389 and an interaction between Sex and D6Mit389 , we found Sex to be significant ( F = 9.1, p = 0.003) and a trend toward significance for the interaction term ( F = 2.8, p = 0.097).

The items measuring somatization show a trend toward significance (p<0.097), with an improvement in these symptoms throughout the treatment from T1 to T3.

Also, it is worth mentioning that the addition of tonabersat to radiotherapy resulted in a prolonged survival time, with a trend toward significance (p-value = 0.097) compared to the use of TMZ in conjunction with radiotherapy (i.e., ‘control’ group).