A weakly significant difference in the modularity of the dTDA system was calculated in the planktonic suspension at day 4 (Permutation tests; p -value = 0.012).
← all phrases
“a weakly significant difference”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
Within the Roopkund_A group which has ancestry that falls within the variation of present-day South Asians, we observe a weakly significant difference in the proportion of West Eurasian-related ancestry in males and females ( p = 0.015 by a permutation test across individuals; Supplementary Note 8 ), with systematically lower proportions of West Eurasian-related ancestry in males than females.
In the R2A medium, a weakly significant difference in microbial composition between bulk medium and swab samples was observed (ANOVA, p = 0.024).
There is a weakly significant difference in terms of ID50 between these groups (p = 0.024, Wilcoxon test; p = 0.04, ANOVA), such that bacteria that are ingested tend to have a higher ID50 (median 1 000 000 vs 1000 for inhaled and 40 for other routes).
There was additionally a weakly significant difference between the helminth- and species-specific datasets ( p = 0.02759).
Instead, we find a weakly significant difference for L int for the cytological data (Fig. 4 D, p = 0.03), whereas converting cytological data from SC space to DNA space using chromosome lengths reported in ref. 55 results in significantly smaller L int for females (Fig. 4 C, p = 10 −6 ).
While PERMANOVA indicates a weakly significant difference between MMR and LMR food feeders ( p = 0.033; Table S1 in Additional file 4 ), we made a post-hoc prediction that this trend was driven by the morphological separation of the Cacatuidae (all of whom are MMR or mixed food feeders) from the other Psittaciformes on PC3.
• Sarcomere length shows a weakly significant difference (p=0.038) between the whole WT data set and bio rep 1, but no difference between the whole WT data set and the HA<720 group.
Although a weakly significant difference between breakfast skippers and non-skippers was observed in one of the five NAPLAN scales (Numeracy, p = 0.04), the difference between the two groups was less than 3% and unlikely to be of great importance.
Furthermore, there is a comparably small influence of hand on the GSR: when the data for left and right hands was compared separately at each threat there was a weakly significant difference between the hands only at the ‘late’ threat (p = 0.04, Wilcoxon sign rank test Holm Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons).
There also were no significant differences in Beta-diversity in control subjects <30 or ≥30, but among MS subjects, there was a weakly significant difference (p = 0.04) in Beta-diversity between those <30 or ≥30 (Fig.
3.1.2 Caste differences THS was different by sex/caste ( p < .001) (Table 2 ) with the greatest difference in queens from workers and males (Table 3 , p < .001) and a weakly significant difference between workers and males ( p = .044).
No decrease with age was found when participants were divided in four different age groups (18–30, 31–40, 41–50, and > 50 years old), with just one exception in the PD1 survey where a weakly significant difference was found between the 18–30 and the 41–50 years old groups ( P = 0.0451, Supplementary Fig.
Blastocystis hominis showed only a weakly significant difference in prevalence between the regions when fitted alone with REGION (REGION × INFECTION, χ 2 3 = 7.85, P = 0.049) but was also a component of an interaction with SEX in the minimum sufficient model after initial fitting of all the factors (REGION × SEX × INFECTION, χ 2 3 = 8.17, P = 0.043).
gloriosa has a weakly significant difference ( P =0.04955) on the adaxial leaf surface compared to Y. filamentosa.
In terms of student origin, except for a weakly significant difference in the Emotions Related to Verbal Violence dimension ( p < 0.05), no statistically significant urban–rural differences were obtained in other dimensions or the total questionnaire score, with extremely small effect sizes across all dimensions.
A weakly significant difference (p≤0.05) of last single rupture forces was recorded between 0 s and 5 s contact time and a strongly significant difference (p≤0.001) between 0 s and 10 s contact time.
21.9 ± 7.9; P < 0.01), yielding also a weakly significant difference in the proportion among amphibians and reptiles (0.42 ± 0.16 vs. 0.35 ± 0.10; P = 0.051).
There was a weakly significant difference between the model with only g ( x ) ( M = 0 . 651 , SD = 0 . 036 ) and the model with both g ( x ) and f ( x ), p = 0 . 061 .
Additionally, a weakly significant difference was noted in outpatient hospital care visits (−0.11, p = 0.062, CI −0.24 to 0.01).
Difference contrast analysis showed significant differences between low and medium arousal words ( F (1,48) = 4.9, p = 0.032, η 2 = 0.093) and a weakly significant difference between medium and high arousal words ( F (1,48) = 3.36, p = 0.073, η 2 = 0.065).
Furthermore, we observe a weakly significant difference between transfers within Israel and Germany in Study 2 ( p = . 099 , two-sided FP).
In this murine cohort, glucuronic acid levels were also a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (HR=1.29, p=0.018), and a weakly significant difference in survival was observed between the top and bottom quartiles of glucuronic acid levels in this cohort (p=0.1, Figure 1C ).
For respondents with high familiarity ratings, there is a weakly significant difference between socially interactive and solitary respondents, with the former having lower disruption ratings than the latter ( U = 197.000, p < 0.1).
We consider it possible that PD-L1 decreases in tissues as a change in immune profile during HCV SVR, as with DAAs treatment because we analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes and there was a weakly significant difference compared with the liver tissue analysis.