“a weakly significant difference”

There was a weakly significant difference between the model with only g ( x ) ( M = 0 . 651 , SD = 0 . 036 ) and the model with both g ( x ) and f ( x ), p = 0 . 061 .

Additionally, a weakly significant difference was noted in outpatient hospital care visits (−0.11, p = 0.062, CI −0.24 to 0.01).

All but Cer(d18:1/18:0), TG(50:1), TG(50:2), SM(40:1), and SM(42:1) were proven to have strongly significantly different distributions in the two groups, while Cer(d18:1/16:0) showed only a weakly significant difference ( p = 0.067).

Difference contrast analysis showed significant differences between low and medium arousal words ( F (1,48) = 4.9, p = 0.032, η 2 = 0.093) and a weakly significant difference between medium and high arousal words ( F (1,48) = 3.36, p = 0.073, η 2 = 0.065).

Statistical analysis indicated a weakly significant difference ( p = 0.073, Student’s t test), but the overall trend indicates that intercluster interactions were reduced.

The results indicated a significant difference in the “good/bad” mood dimension ( p = .030), with a large effect size ( d = 0.820), as well as a weakly significant difference in the calm/nervous mood dimension ( p = .076) with a medium effect size ( d = 0.665).

Furthermore, we observe a weakly significant difference between transfers within Israel and Germany in Study 2 ( p = . 099 , two-sided FP).

In this murine cohort, glucuronic acid levels were also a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (HR=1.29, p=0.018), and a weakly significant difference in survival was observed between the top and bottom quartiles of glucuronic acid levels in this cohort (p=0.1, Figure 1C ).

For respondents with high familiarity ratings, there is a weakly significant difference between socially interactive and solitary respondents, with the former having lower disruption ratings than the latter ( U = 197.000, p < 0.1).

not reached; HR 0.26; CI 95% 0.06–1.08; p = 0.05) revealed a weakly significant difference in survival, and stages pT2–pT4 revealed no significant difference in survival (pT2 vs. ypT2: median OS 129 months vs. not reached; HR 0.78; CI 95% 0.42–1.46; p = 0.44; pT3 vs. ypT3: median OS 58 vs. 91 months; HR 0.83; CI 95% 0.61–1.13; p = 0.24, pT4 vs. ypT4: median OS 30 vs. 31 months; HR 0.84; CI 95% 0.58–1.21; p = 0.35).

We consider it possible that PD-L1 decreases in tissues as a change in immune profile during HCV SVR, as with DAAs treatment because we analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes and there was a weakly significant difference compared with the liver tissue analysis.

When comparing the PSCs between the high-confidence trials and the low-confidence trials, there was a weakly significant difference from t = 8 to 10 s since the onset of the delay period (Supplementary Fig. 5b ).

P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, whereas 0.05< P<0.1 was considered to indicate a weakly significant difference.

We found no statistically significant differences in tournament entry decisions among the OCP stages, whereas they found a weakly significant difference in the likelihood to participate in a tournament between subjects born before and after the introduction of the OCP.

Only a weakly significant difference was detected between different pigs.

A weakly significant difference in HHS values was demonstrated in patients undergoing cemented versus non-cemented endoprostheses.

Exceptions are the Nnf1–Ndc80C length ( p = 1.0%) and the Ndc80C–Ndc80N length ( p = 1.9%) in the DMSO-treated Nnf1–Ndc80C–Ndc80N triple, showing a weakly significant difference, see Example 3.4.

In support of this possibility, Rosen (1996) observed that in the rat somatosensory/somatomotor cortex, asymmetry in tissue volume is strongly associated with the LR differences in the numbers of two subtypes of neuron, but there is only a weakly significant difference in cell packing density for one of the neuronal subtypes, suggesting that the left and right sides have similar neural architectures and show a proportional scaling to achieve differences in the quantity of neural tissue.

Conclusions Our results show a weakly significant difference between affected and unaffected twins in the cross-sectional prevalence of GBV-C viremia.

For humans, there was no difference in NI or Z* between OXPHOS genes encoded in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes ( P MWU > 0.46 for both statistics), whereas for flies there was a weakly significant difference that was driven by the fact that the nuclear OXPHOS genes in our sample had values of NI and Z* that were more consistent with an excess of nonsynonymous substitutions ( NI , P MWU = 0.026; Z* , P MWU = 0.022) ( Figure S2 ).

5 ), a weakly significant difference in rates (p value of 0.016).

did not find a significant difference in the right eye but reported a weakly significant difference in the left eye [ 48 ].

A weakly significant difference (p-value rather close to α = 0.05%) could be found only for BT vs.

The comparison of measurements in the KL, EP, and LP sections between OCT and traditional histopathology shows a weakly significant difference only for the LP compartment (Table 5 ).

There is a weakly significant difference between the proportion of entrepreneurs among SHS adopters (19.65%) and non-adopters (15.02%).