Barely Significant
← all phrases

a weakly significant difference

57 sentences · 57 papers · 78 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since

In the literature

a weakly significant differencep = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Within the Roopkund_A group which has ancestry that falls within the variation of present-day South Asians, we observe a weakly significant difference in the proportion of West Eurasian-related ancestry in males and females ( p = 0.015 by a permutation test across individuals; Supplementary Note 8 ), with systematically lower proportions of West Eurasian-related ancestry in males than females.
a weakly significant differenceP = 0.030.6× alphagold
bjoerkna , the Kruskal-Wallis H-test followed by multiple comparisons revealed a weakly significant difference in the abundance of only D. sphyrna between B. bjoerkna and hybrids with B. bjoerkna maternal origin (Kruskal-Wallis H-test: H (2, 106) = 6.99, P = 0.03, multiple comparison: P = 0.046).
a weakly significant differencep = 0.0330.7× alphagold
While PERMANOVA indicates a weakly significant difference between MMR and LMR food feeders ( p = 0.033; Table S1 in Additional file 4 ), we made a post-hoc prediction that this trend was driven by the morphological separation of the Cacatuidae (all of whom are MMR or mixed food feeders) from the other Psittaciformes on PC3.
a weakly significant differenceP -value = 0.0340.7× alphagold
A weakly significant difference is observed between reads obtained using Methods MDE and P ( P -value = 0.034) ( Table 1 ), consistent with previous observations of systematic differences between DNA preservation in petrous and cementum samples ( Parker et al. 2020 ); however, we also note that the use of a bleach-based decontamination step in the MDE protocol may have contributed to this observed pattern.
a weakly significant differencep = 0.040.8× alphagold
Furthermore, there is a comparably small influence of hand on the GSR: when the data for left and right hands was compared separately at each threat there was a weakly significant difference between the hands only at the ‘late’ threat (p = 0.04, Wilcoxon sign rank test Holm Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons).
a weakly significant differenceP = 0.04510.9× alphagold
No decrease with age was found when participants were divided in four different age groups (18–30, 31–40, 41–50, and > 50 years old), with just one exception in the PD1 survey where a weakly significant difference was found between the 18–30 and the 41–50 years old groups ( P = 0.0451, Supplementary Fig.
a weakly significant differencep = 0.0470.9× alphagold
The two radiotracers showed a weakly significant difference in the lymph node DR, namely the lymph node region resulted positive in 28% (19/69) of [ 18 F]fluciclovine patients ( p = 0.047) and in 15% (10/69) of [ 18 F]fluorocholine patients.
a weakly significant differenceP = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Blastocystis hominis showed only a weakly significant difference in prevalence between the regions when fitted alone with REGION (REGION × INFECTION, χ 2 3 = 7.85, P = 0.049) but was also a component of an interaction with SEX in the minimum sufficient model after initial fitting of all the factors (REGION × SEX × INFECTION, χ 2 3 = 8.17, P = 0.043).
a weakly significant differencep < 0.051.0× alphagold
In terms of student origin, except for a weakly significant difference in the Emotions Related to Verbal Violence dimension ( p < 0.05), no statistically significant urban–rural differences were obtained in other dimensions or the total questionnaire score, with extremely small effect sizes across all dimensions.