Barely Significant
← all phrases

almost reached statistical significance

88 sentences · 88 papers · 424 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The remaining analyzed risk parameters—T and N pathological stage, and LVI and PNI status—did not show a statistically significant association with overall survival time by univariate analysis ( p > 0.05), while received adjuvant therapy almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.05).
It is worth noting that the incidence of limited forearm rotation (more than 10 degrees) was higher in the PF group (16%) compared to the IMF group (10%), and the difference almost reached statistical significance [OR (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.31, 0.99), P = 0.05].
At 6 months, in multivariable analysis, women with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 8% were more likely to reach the primary endpoint [aOR 4.4 (2.1–9.3)] p < 0.001, while those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2 almost reached statistical significance [adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 2.0 (0.98–4.1)] p = 0.05.
Interestingly, the severity of IBD at the time of the second diagnosis almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.053) in relation to improvement, which might suggest that the timing of the therapy modification in relation to disease severity is crucial.
The task × glasses interaction almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.053) because the differences in favor of the strobe glasses condition were more accentuated for the task performed with the ball (small to moderate differences) than for the task performed without the ball (negligible differences) (Figure 2 ).
However, of note is the INTERACT sub-scale Negative Interactions, which almost reached statistical significance ( F [1, 61] = 3.88, p = 0.053, partial eta 2 = 0.060), where it was observed that residents in the experimental condition exhibited fewer negative interactions at T1, compared to residents in the control condition.
There was no overall difference in COVID-19-associated deaths, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.23, p=0.993, but subgroup analysis showed a non-significant reduced risk of death in veterans aged 61–70 years, and a 38% higher risk in veterans aged over 70 years which almost reached statistical significance, p=0.054.
the control group at most study visits (median [Q1; Q3], Visit 3 test: 2 [1; 3]; control: 3 [2; 3]; p = 0.001; Visit 4 test: 1 [1; 2]; control: 2 [1; 3]; p < 0.001; and Visit 5 test: 1 [1; 2]; control: 2 [2; 3]; p = 0.004) and almost reached statistical significance at Visit 2 (test: 2 [2; 3]; control: 3 [2; 3], p = 0.055).