The regression identified an almost significant coefficient between carbonyl index and UVB radiation (p = 0.079, F = 3.75, degrees of freedom = 12).
← all phrases
“almost significant”
Sighted at
p=0.06
In the literature
1 A1, A2, A3, C) and almost significant vs. mCRP injected group ( p = 0.0794).
A t test revealed that the participants reporting lower RFA presented a more concrete mindset ( M = 18, SD = 4.46) than the participants reporting higher RFA ( M = 18.50, SD = 4.08); this difference was almost significant, t (871) = − 1.71, p = .08.
In multivariable analysis, preprocedural posterior leaflet height (PLH) (OR 0.16, p = 0.02) and immediate postprocedural MR degree (IPOMR) (OR 12.4, p = 0.03) were predictive; preprocedural Ejection Fraction (EF) was almost significant (OR 0.87, p = 0.08) (Figure 1).
Upon treatment, an almost significant trend (F (2,69) = 2.55, p = 0.08) in the increase in TH+ dopaminergic neurons was observed for 6-OHDA organoids treated with BM-MSC secretome when compared to the non-treated 6-OHDA organoids (Control−). 6-OHDA is a highly oxidizable dopamine analog, which can be captured through the dopamine transporters (DAT) [ 33 ].
Furthermore, an almost significant reduction was demonstrated comparing the papillary measurements of people over 55 years old with adults between 26 and 54 years ( p = 0.08).
The difference within the two groups was almost significant ( p = .08) (Figure 2d ; Table S1 ). 3.4.
No significant difference was observed in the onset-to-door time between the two groups (p = 0.97), whereas an almost significant difference was observed in the door-to-picture time (p = 0.08).
Independent t-tests showed no statistical significance, either for any of the neurophysiological measurements, or for neuropsychological battery, except for scale of Re-Appraisal in ERQ (R ERQ) [t (28) = 2.64, p = 0.014, d = 0.97], and almost significant for LF/HF ratio FFT [t (25) = −1.78, p = 0.08, d = −0.69].
We observed significant negative correlations between the increase in weight ( p = 0.043), FM ( p = 0.023), and FFM ( p = 0.033) measured by skinfolds and the baseline FEV1/FVC ratio, as well as positive correlations between the number of severe exacerbations in the year prior to starting ETI and the increase in FFM (BIA) ( p = 0.022) and almost significant FFM by skinfolds ( p = 0.08). 4.
In particular, the infantile-onset group showed an almost significant difference in the survival rate when compared with pediatric-onset or late-onset groups ( p value = 0.0811 and 0.0680, respectively) while only a tendency was observed by comparing pediatric-onset and late-onset groups ( p value = 0.1570).
The cortical region was again relatively spared, although a significant increase was found in phosphorylated tau at Thr231 and Ser422 in the soluble fraction and an almost significant increase was found at the AT8 ( P = 0.0819) site in the insoluble fraction (Fig. 3 d).
Furthermore, the difference between the two groups was almost significant ( p = 0.082), indicating that treatment with IF tends to significantly reduce the pain felt upon waking up each morning, after 40 days of treatment ( Table 2 ).
2 A and B), while the increase in H3K9me3 was almost significant ( t = 1.81, P = 0.0829, R 2 = 0.12; Fig. 2 A and B).
At the third sampling point (S20), tree species did not significantly impact Shannon–Wiener Index and Simpson’s index though the difference between Noble fir and Sitka spruce was almost significant ( P = 0.088 and P = 0.095).
The prominent peak for the FP300‐complex condition that is visible in Figure 3B presumably contributed to the significant main effect for FP ( Fc (1, 23) = 5.41, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.19) and to an almost significant RC × FP interaction ( Fc (1, 23) = 3.17, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.12). 3.3 S‐Locked Surface Laplacian Waves Figure 4A shows S‐locked SLWs as a function of FP duration and hemisphere, collapsed across RC condition.
As for craving, the between‐group effects were almost significant (light therapy group vs. light placebo group, 0.81, [95%CI, −0.09 to 1.71], p = 0.09; cognitive training group vs. light placebo group, 0.90, [95%CI, −0.02 to 1.83], p = 0.06) (Figure 2D ).
In IL of alcohol-trained rats ( Table 5 ), ANOVA revealed significant effects of Cue ( p < 0.05) and almost significant Cue × Time interaction ( p = 0.09) for glutamate, significant Cue × Time interaction ( p < 0.05) for dopamine ( Fig. 3F ), significant effect of Cue ( p < 0.05) and Cue × Time interaction ( p < 0.05) for GABA ( Fig. 3H ), and significant effect of Time ( p < 0.05) for aspartate ( Fig. 3L ).
iWUE is almost significant ( P = 0.09).
The difference observed in alcohol consumption is almost significant in the MLR model (between the ID1 and ID2 groups, p = 0.091) ( Table 11 ). 4.
Besides, there was an almost significant improvement in the domains body image scale ( p = 0.096), and FROM-16 emotional domain ( p = 0.075) (Table 5 ).
Interestingly, there was a trend that individuals who are employed had IBS more than the unemployed participants, with an almost significant difference (p value = 0.096).
4 ): (i) The regression model using IR Index as DV and ROIs’ θ as predictors was almost significant (R2= 0.326, F (4,23) = 2.300, p =.096).
The sFLT-1 isolated value showed an almost significant increase in the diagnosis week for FGR only (PCC −0.38; p < 0.10).
However, the difference in OS was almost significant, and there was a tendency for better survival in the WR group [univariate HR =0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02–1.48, P=0.10], especially in the early follow-up period.