“almost significant”

the least significant variable was dropped, one at a time, until only statistically significant or almost significant effects ( P <0·10) were left.

The sFLT-1 isolated value showed an almost significant increase in the diagnosis week for FGR only (PCC −0.38; p < 0.10).

Other variables that were almost significant ( p < 0.1), namely, soil pH, total nitrogen content, and mean annual temperature, explained 5.8% of the RBAI variability.

Of the highest ranked loci in the Ewens-Watterson test, two were almost significant ( COR008 and AHT006 , P <0.1), two were significant ( NVHEQ079 and TKY316 , P <0.05) and one was highly significant ( TKY222 , P <0.01) for the F ST test.

VF measures, reflux, and venous diameter No significant statistical differences were found in the VF rate in the deep veins (CFV, FV and popliteal veins [PVs]), except in the left femoral vein (LFV) where almost significant differences were observed ( P < .10).

The relationship between SOFA score and ECLT remained significant in the non-septic patients (r = 0.45, p = 0.01) and was almost significant in the septic patients (r = 0.39, p = 0.11).

A correlation between PRx and both CBFica was almost significant (p = 0.112 and p = 0.137).

However, we did find an almost significant difference for TrpN, with an increase in children with moderate impairment (389.13 vs. 528.14; p = 0.13).

This finding was almost significant (p = 0.15).

Post hoc general linear models controlling for sleep onset and maintenance problems at t1 found no effect of presence of recurring memories ( F (1, 32) = 0.08, p =0.78) on later sleep onset and maintenance problems at t2, but an almost significant influence of presence of hypervigilance ( F (1, 32) = 4.05, p =0.53).

21 Outcome data Two large randomized trials (DEFINE-FLAIR, n = 2492; iFR-SWEDEHEART, n = 2037) showed the noninferiority of an iFR vs an FFR-guided PCI strategy during follow-up at 1 year and 5 years, although iFR showed lower revascularization rates with almost significant P values. 31 , 32 The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 18.6% (iFR) vs 16.8% (FFR) ( P = .63) after 5 years in deferred patients who presented with stable angina (n = 611) or nonculprit lesions of ACS (unstable angina and NSTEMI, n = 297).

The range of RGS in DNA-diploids was relatively narrow (Table 1 ), with an almost significant increase towards the east (latitude: r s = −0.154, P = 0.804; longitude: r s = 0.872, P = 0.054; Fig. 2 F, Fig.

When all study subjects were distributed in quintiles we observed that this frequency was higher in Q3 than Q4 and Q5 with an almost significant p-value (Additional file 3 : Table S3).

Descriptive statistics of the model According to the value of descriptive statistics, it was found that the values were almost significant of each trait, each method, and each item in the model.

I think it's better to report any association as non-significant if p-value is indicating so and try to not use the term almost significant.

Greater security margins were associated with a lower recurrence rate in our study, significantly for the width, and almost significant for the length.

Univariate analysis confirmed that peritumoral CD15 + neutrophils impacted OS and DFS, and the results of multivariate analysis were almost significant ( Tables 2 , 3 ).

Spearman correlation analysis of OF and EPM data-set further revealed that both software tools showed a high comparability, which was almost significant ( Supplementary Figures 7 , 9 ).

After the PMT, an almost significant improvement was observed in APQ‐positive parenting with higher scores for mothers.

Interestingly, the overrepresentation of minor alleles G691S and S904S was identified in an almost significant percentage of tumors >10 mm at diagnosis, hinting at a possible role in tumor behavior.

Supplementary Table S3 establishes the almost significant differences (0.053). 3.3.

1D and 1F ). As for the percentage of open arm entries, CLO had an almost significant main effect and age had a significant main effect [F(2, 46)=2.762, P =0.0736; F(2, 46)=25.27, P <0.001].

Tukey’s multiple comparison test revealed an almost significant comparison between the regressions out produced by the L2 learners when reading sentences with animate objects and DOM omission and sentences with animate objects and DOM ( β = 0.11, SE = 0.04, t = 2.99, p = 0.06).

Although the L-ROI measurements provided significant or almost significant results in some analyses, the S-ROI measurements provided significant results in a larger number of analyses. ∆ ADC between pretreatment and post-EBRT ADC measurements proved to be a significant prognostic predictor in OS and RFS calculations.

The confidence intervals of the adjusted means clearly overlap at T1; at T2 overlapping is minimal: the difference is almost significant.