“almost significant”

In terms of beta diversity, no major differences were evident at the phylum or genus level between WT and TG mice (Supplementary Figure 10A ), whereas there were significant differences at the feature level between MC and M mice ( p = 0.004) and almost significant differences at the genus level ( p = 0.057, FDR = 0.057: Supplementary Figure 10B ).

A higher percentage of patients achieved a response irrespective of the need for IMV in the CsA plus standard of care group although the RR was almost significant 2.833 (95% CI, 0.908–8.840; p = 0.057).

For XSTAT versus FCBT this difference was almost significant ( p = 0.057) (Table 3 ).

An almost significant between-subject effect was found for Clarity, F (1,15) = 4.265, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.221, and a significant effect for Engagement, F (1,15) = 4.957, p = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.248, and Gender, F (1,15) = 9.521, p = 0.008, η p 2 = 0.388, females have higher RR, while participants with higher RR have higher Engagement but possibly lower Clarity.

For N2 latency, the results revealed an almost significant difference between groups [ F (2,23)=3.26, p =0.057] and, importantly, that the two-fold group×electrode interaction reached significance [ F (4,46)=5.70, p =0.001.

The Tajima’s D test detected significant deviations from neutrality in Og -1 and Og -2 (Mean D = − 2.01, p value = 0.0010), almost significant deviation in Osj -1 and Osj -2 (Mean D = − 1.29, p value = 0.0575), and non-significant deviation in Osi -1 and Osi -2 (Additional file 5 : Table S3).

The difference between the intervention and control groups of CRs in the change in use of oral health care services was almost significant ( p = 0.058).

However, the mean change rate for the longest interval (∼106 generations between the first and last sample) was 1.04, which was almost significant ( t -test = 2.07, P = 0.058).

In the post-hoc analysis, the difference was significant compared to the groups with minimal to no (P<0.001) or with mild (P=0.032) disability and almost significant compared to the group with complete disability (P=0.058).

We observed an almost significant correlation between interocular suppression and stereoacuity, as obtained from the Optec 3500 test ( ρ = 0.298, p = 0.058).

and OTU_0011 Boudiera spp.) were positively correlated with yield under control conditions ( P value < 0.01; R > 0.10), while two showed a negative correlation, one under control conditions (OTU_0001 Chaetomiaceae; P value = 0.003; R = − 0.18) and one under drought that was almost significant (OTU_0019 Rhizophydiales; P value = 0.058; R = − 0.11) (Fig. 2 a).

The difference in the dead spruce proportion between forest types was almost significant (df = 5, F = 2.196, p = 0.058).

This was confirmed by an almost significant fit line slope ( p = 0.0582 and an R 2 = 0.992) ( Figure 4 B).

There was an almost significant reduction in acute ward admission ( p = 0.059) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

Cosinor analysis revealed almost significant 12-h ( p = 0.059), not 24-h ( p = 0.107) variability (Supplementary Table 2 ).

8.6 ± 2.5%) which was almost significant ( p = 0.059).

Expression levels of BigDop1 were significantly lower in gynes than in workers (Mann-Whitney U-test, z = −1.965, P < 0.05; Fig 4A ), but expression levels of the other three tested genes did not differ significantly between castes ( BigDop2 : z = −1.890, P = 0.059; BigDop3 : z = −1.587, P = 1.112; BigDopEcR : z = −0.302, P = 0.762; Fig 4B–4D ), although levels of BigDop2 were almost significant ( P = 0.059).

However, a lower level of participant-reported SCCs (negative beta values) for this late progression was almost significant ( p = 0.059).

In addition, significant positive correlations were found between the snatch and the total with the best individual RSI ( Figure 2 ), while the correlation between the clean and jerk with the RSI was almost significant (r = 0.736, p = 0.059, very large).

Model 1 revealed an almost significant increase in body area satisfaction during the intervention (b = 0.698, t(136.24) = 1.899, p = .0597) and no change afterwards.

There was no significant difference in the final weights of the fish between the diet groups ( P = 0·16); however, there was a moderately lower SGR of 1·87 in the 10 % VLC-Conc1 diet group compared with SGR of 2·17 in the control group with 0 % VLC-PUFA ( P = 0·04), and an almost significant difference in TGC between the diet groups ( P = 0·06).

The lead climbing grade showed an almost significant adverse influence onto the incidence of PPSIs (p=0.06) and reached significance if looking at the younger injured climbers with PPSIs (<16 years).

Litter size was almost significant ( P = 0.06) and we decided to include it in the genetic models [1] to [5].

Among genes related to epithelial integrity, zonulin showed an almost significant upregulation ( p = 0.06), while EpCAM appeared to be downregulated in all samples (not significant because of a high dispersion).

SNP6 was almost significant as predictor in the novel eight-variant model ( p = 0.06), and showed up as a significant fixed effect in the single variant tests ( p value < 0.05*) and reduced three-variant model ( p value < 0.05*).