Barely Significant
← all phrases

an increasing trend

28,910 sentences · 28,910 papers · 0 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Results For the index scores of the two groups, the results of repeated-measures ANOVA indicated an increasing trend at three time points, i.e., after 2 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 3 months after the end of treatment ( p < 0.001); in terms of intergroup effects, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in WAB naming scores ( F = 4.865, p = 0.042); and the aphasia quotient (AQ), listening comprehension, and naming scores of the two groups had interactive effects ( F AQ = 11.316, P AQ = 0.000; F listening = 8.205, P listening = 0.002; F naming = 27.46, P naming = 0.000).
an increasing trendP < .0010.0× alphagold
Among patients without calcification at baseline, by the end of 4-year follow-up, 42.7% had CAC progression, 57.5% had AAC progression, 33.5% had CVC progression, and 68.5% had total VC progression, which represented an increasing trend over the study period ( P < .001 for trend for all comparisons) (eTable 2 in Supplement 1 ).
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The crude death rate of cancer in the six provinces of northwest China from 2013 to 2021 showed an increasing trend (AAPC = 3.96%, p < 0.001).The age-standardized mortality rate of cancer in six provinces in northwest China was overall stable from 2013 to 2021 (AAPC = − 0.13%, p = 0.928) but exhibited a decreasing trend from 2017 to 2021 (AAPC = − 5.64%, p = 0.047).
an increasing trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
Regarding SD clusters, we found an increasing trend in ORx and OSRx average within 60 min just before SD clusters, as seen in the positive slopes derived from the fitted linear mixed-effects model (0.0013 [ p = 0.001] for ORx and 0.0009 [ p = 0.0001] for OSRx, respectively; Table 2 ) We also found a decreasing trend in ORx within 60 min just after SD clusters (− 0.0008, p = 0.0288) but no significant trend in OSRx post-SD clusters.
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
CRF developmental trajectories showed an upward trend over five surveys (slope = 0.649, P < 0.001); PD showed a significant weakening trend (slope = − 0.583, P < 0.001); SD showed an increasing trend (slope = 0.345, P < 0.001), and QoL showed a statistically significant weakening trend (slope = − 0.373, P < 0.001).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Similarly, there was an increasing trend in the total PQ base dosage administered (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001), despite no significant differences in total weight-based PQ base dosage administered (3.38 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256) or the proportion of patients in the underdosing group (< 3.5 mg/kg; 296 [73.6%] vs. 167 [68.2%], P = 0.135] between the two periods.