“approached significance”

Age approached significance (β = −0.139, p = 0.051), while employment status was not a significant predictor ( p = 0.961).

The reduction in ED visits with sugammadex was significant in the younger age group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.95; p = 0.017), but only approached significance in the older age group (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–1.00; p = 0.051).

The highest foreign language score ( β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and whether they had participated in intercultural training ( β = 0.110, p = 0.008) remained significant, while the influence of education status approached significance ( β = 0.085, p = 0.051).

When stratified by sex, serum ferritin by stage differed significantly among males ( P = 0.009) and approached significance in females ( P = 0.051) (Figure 1B ).

Notably, the ease score (ChatGPT: 10.33; DeepSeek: 9.03) approached significance (p=0.051) but did not meet the threshold for statistical significance.

The difference between the first and second transfer phases approached significance (Mean Difference = −0.456, p = 0.051), with a Cohen’s d of-1.813, reflecting a large effect size but indicating that this difference was less consistent or reliable compared to the other comparisons ( Table 2 ) ( Figure 5 ). 5 Discussion The present study investigated the impact of implicit and explicit learning on motor task performance across three sessions.

For chronic back pain, none of the personality traits were significant predictors of social exclusion, however, extraversion approached significance ( B = −0.213, p < 0.051) with greater levels of extraversion being associated with less willingness to interact.

Multivariable analysis After adjusting for age, gender, race, stage, and histology, HLA-DRB4 was associated with improved OS ( p = 0.011, HR 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85]) and approached significance for PFS ( p = 0.051, HR 0.61, 95% CI [0.37, 1.00]).

Younger patients (< 60 years) showed a non-significant trend toward higher risk (HR = 1.677, p = 0.087), whereas those ≥ 60 years approached significance (HR = 1.394, p = 0.051), though age interaction was non-significant ( p = 0.544).

For the control group, the main effect of test time under the audio-visual condition approached significance ( F (3, 36) = 2.85, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.192); however, multiple comparisons indicated no significant differences in accuracy across the tests.

The mean global count showed no effect of HAMSB compared with LAMS (0.87 FC; 95% CI, 0.73–1.05; P = 0.152), whereas the mean count of small polyps approached significance (0.79 FC; 95% CI, 0.62–1.0; P = 0.051).

The difference in pre- to post-test change approached significance, t(50) = −2.000, p = .051, favoring a greater reduction in the experimental group; however, this effect did not reach the conventional alpha threshold.

FLR‐miRNA mimics 140 + 149 approached significance ( p = 0.051) for aggrecan deposition.

The MR-PRESSO global test showed no significant evidence of distortion due to pleiotropy for most outcomes, although telomere length approached significance ( P = 0.051).

3 In this current study, positive nodal status approached significance as a predictive factor for disease recurrence (OR 9.638; 95% CI 0.994–93.467; P = 0.051), and the significance of this analysis was likely limited by the low recurrence event rate in this cohort.

However, when mean blood meal virus titres and mean mosquito saliva positivity rates were compared, rho increased and the correlation approached significance (Table 2 , Fig. 1 F, rho = 0.95, P = 0.051).

Histological grade did not show statistically significant differences, though Grade III (poorly differentiated) approached significance (AOR = 0.711, p = 0.051, 95% CI = 0.504 to 1.002).

Consumption of tea approached significance ( P =.051), while consumption of coffee, cheese, and wine were not significant.

Optimism approached significance (β = 0.132, p = 0.051), suggesting marginal influence.

The mean dose to the mandible also approached significance (HR = 1.06, p = 0.0511), suggesting a potential dose-response relationship (Table 2 ).

For SNF%, the overall effect approached significance ( p = 0.0512).

Similarly, Begg’s test approached significance (z = -1.95, p = 0.0516), further suggesting potential bias.

As shown in Table 4 , in the unadjusted repeated measures ANOVA, the within-subjects effect of time approached significance, F (2,78) = 3.08, P = .0517.

Finally, in the analysis of the number of bridge approaches, a significant decrease in VHC‐D in comparison to the VHC‐S group in the 2nd session ( p = 0.0435), whereas in contrast between VHC‐S and VHC‐P, that decrease approached significance in the same session ( p = 0.0517) (Figure 1A ).

At the L4/5 level, the difference between the NPA and NPA + PNB groups approached significance ( P = 0.0518).