Worse self‐reported mental health was associated with lower sleep efficiency in the rural location (estimate = −2.062, SE = 0.816, p = 0.014) and is approaching significance in predicting higher sleep efficiency in the urban location (estimate = 1.584, SE = 0.849, p = 0.067).
← all phrases
“approaching significance”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In Model 2 ( Table 4 ), gender, ethnicity, and SDM scores were significant in predicting CAM disclosure ( P < 0.05), with self-efficacy approaching significance ( P = 0.067).
Interpretation: Marginally significant difference favoring SVM over MLP ( p = 0.067, approaching significance) 3.5.2.
For CB, the Integrated and Partial 1 group displayed a stronger drop in Correct Behavior with the former being significantly different to the Parallel ( p = 0.047) and Partial 2 ( p = 0.009) group, while the latter was approaching significance to the Parallel ( p = 0.067) and showing clearly significant difference to the Partial 2 ( p = 0.015) group.
A small correlation approaching significance (r=.285, p=.067) indicated that with a larger sample size the trust subscale may be correlated with the questions about the individual and other TTMs having trust of the CMs in their respective villages.
Interestingly, ORR, CRR and TTNT showed numerical but not statistically significant improvement with higher DDI, with CRR approaching significance ( p = 0.067).
In the meantime, SS trypanosomes also exhibited a trend of Metacasp-3 gene up-regulation at 27 °C, approaching significance ( p = 0.0678) under a two-tailed paired Student’s t -test.
The only biomarker approaching significance was pEGFR at 24 h ( P = 0.068), with the sensitive group demonstrating decreased pEGFR expression relative to control (89.3% (95% CI: 36.1%, 142.5%) while the resistant group had a higher level of pEGFR (137.7% (95% CI: 101.4%, 173.9%).
In the case of cognitive performance and MD, most methods did not indicate significant causal relationships, although the IVW method showed a p value approaching significance ( p = 0.068).
Non-Caucasian patients had shorter median travel times, with the association approaching significance (p = 0.068).
The presence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy was approaching significance ( P = .068).
Although the groups did not differ on whether they were concerned about committing sexually inappropriate acts ( P = 0.78), more cutters than noncutters (approaching significance) endorsed the idea that their concern with committing sexually inappropriate behavior increased their interest in castration ( P = 0.068).
The difference between treatments at 3 months was also approaching significance in favour of dAM-sBCL ( p = 0.068).
5 a), which was higher than that of other three biomarkers, where the difference with NfL was significant ( p = 0.0193) and the difference with p-tau217 was approaching significance ( p = 0.0688) (Additional file 1: Table S6 ).
The ANOVA analysis produced a p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.0689).
When the cell line ZR-75-1 is excluded from the low-frequency methylator group, the average DNMT3b protein level for the low-frequency methylator cells is 0.91-fold that of MCF12A cells, approaching significance when compared to the hypermethylator cell lines (p = 0.069).
The scores for loneliness increased with the hours of employment of the participants but this was approaching significance ( p = 0.069).
The only indirect effect approaching significance was for thwarted belongingness via protective factors ( β = 0.07, p = 0.069).
The excreta of the control group only showed higher crude protein than the FM group; the other groups represented intermediate values with differences approaching significance ( p = 0.069).
A 2-tailed Pearson permutation correlation analysis between changes in mAAT and MADRS was performed, and the result was approaching significance ( P =0.069).
Despite the small sample size, a positive coefficient, approaching significance, is observed for stiffness ( p = 0.069), while the disease duration displays a p -value far from significance.
We demonstrated a significant positive correlation ( p ≤ 0.05) between the median expression value for the five main microRNAs from the miR-302 cluster (miR-302a~d and miR-367) and expression levels of nine of the 10 TFs tested, with the correlation for the tenth TF, PAX6 , approaching significance ( p = 0.069).
A 3×2×2 (stimulation condition×task block×stimulation strength) mixed model ANOVA with response bias ( β ) as the dependent variable showed a main effect of stimulation condition, approaching significance ( F (2, 56)=2.8, p =.069, η 2 =.091).
Only the main effect of baseline versus post-test in the ANOVA reached significance ( F (1, 39) = 11.69, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.230), and this was driven not only by a Vitamin-B6 effect ( t (15) = 2.65, p = 0.018, d = 0.66) but also by an effect approaching significance for Vitamin-B12 ( t (15) = 1.96, p = 0.069, d = 0.49), and a non-significant reduction in the placebo group ( t (9) = 1.55, p = 0.156, d = 0.49).
Secondary outcomes showed effects for cognitive functioning (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.06, 0.64], p < .05) and loneliness (g = -0.29, 95% CI [-0.50, -0.08], p < .01), with effects on quality of life approaching significance (g = 0.22, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.46], p = .07).