Barely Significant
← all phrases

approaching significance

1,620 sentences · 1,620 papers · 3,275 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significanceP = .13892.8× alphagold
Both methods showed negative associations between CLIC5 and CP, with the weighted median method achieving statistical significance (beta = −0.1561, SE = 0.07822, P = .04593) and the weighted mode method approaching significance (beta = −0.1728, SE = 0.1096, P = .1389; Table 1 and Fig. 1 ). 3.5.
approaching significancep = 0.142.8× alphagold
While group differences were non-significant at 18 months, average bone strength increased 2.4% from baseline in the 18-mo HiProt group (0.09 ± 0.11kN), increased 1.0% in the 6-mo HiProt group (0.03 ± 0.11kN), but decreased −0.6% in the RecProt group (−0.02 ± 0.10kN), with the RecProt versus 18-mo HiProt group comparison approaching significance ( p = 0.14; Table 2 ).
approaching significancep -value < 0.153.0× alphagold
Due to the preliminary nature of this study, and to provide rich data for future studies to explore further, we report results for potentially noteworthy findings which are tests that achieved statistical significance ( p -value ≤ 0.05), and tests where the fold change was >1 or the p -value was approaching significance (0.05 < p -value < 0.15).
approaching significancep = 0.163.2× alphagold
The paired-samples t -tests, α = 0.01, with a mean difference of 0.565, 99% CI [0.017, 1.112], p = 0.008 for the ANN, 0.437, 99% CI [0.151, 0.722], p = 0.0003 for the LDA, 0.488, 99% CI [0.083, 0.892], p = 0.003 for the LIN-SVM, and 0.372, 99% CI [−0.111, 0.857], p = 0.040 for the RBF-SVM, all revealed significant differences or approached significance between the two approaches without any correction for multiple comparisons (noting that only the LDA result remained significant, p = 0.0012, after Bonferroni correction, with the ANN, p = 0.032, and the LIN-SVM, p = 0.012, approaching significance; the RBF-SVM, p = 0.16, would be considered not significant).
approaching significancep < 0.24.0× alphagold
Variables approaching significance differences ( p < 0.2) between those readmitted and not readmitted within 30 days were included in a binary logistic regression analysis using a backwards Wald selection method to determine factors associated with being readmitted within 30 days of the index admission. 3.
approaching significancep = 0.357.0× alphagold
The rate of blastocyst development between CRISPR injected embryos and non-injected controls was also not significantly different at day 5 or 6, but was approaching significance by day 7 of embryo culture ( p = 0.35, 0.08, 0.06, n = 566, 863, 859, 3 replicates, respectively).
approaching significancep = 0.438.6× alphagold
Following up on the interaction effects approaching significance, we could observe that the taVNS and sham group reported similar familiarity‐based memory, t (120) = −0.78, p = 0.43, but the taVNS group showed a recollection‐based memory advantage, t (120) = 2.3, p = 0.01.
approaching significancep=0.5511.0× alphagold
Analyses using substantive attempt as the dependent/outcome variable returned no significant results except for finding Near Psychotic Somatization subscale score approaching significance as a negative predictor of substantive SA (beta=-0.241, p=0.55) when regressed with scores on Frantic Hopelessness and Ruminative flooding subscales.