Barely Significant
← all phrases

at the limit of significance

89 sentences · 89 papers · 1,888 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.054

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

at the limit of significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
For plasma melatonin, the ingestion of the PR form caused a progressive increase in concentrations, which was at the limit of significance at T10 (44.9 ± 68.8 pg/mL versus 4.6 ± 1.9 pg/mL at baseline, p = 0.057), then significant at the following times of sampling.
at the limit of significancep = 0.0591.2× alphagold
In the left pre-frontal area, the Cho/Cr values trended to be lower in the pHSP subjects compared to the HC group, but the difference was statistically at the limit of significance (0.79 ± 0.13 vs. 0.71 ± 0.11; p = 0.059, after adjustment for sex and age at T 0 ).
at the limit of significanceP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Moreover, several qualitative and quantitative studies conducted in other cities in Morocco and other countries worldwide have identified physician perception as a factor that can influence generic prescribing.[ 11 , 14 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] In our results, GPs’ perception that the quality of generics is high emerged in the multivariate analysis as an important factor influencing their prescription of these drugs (OR = 2.82 [1.08-7.36]), despite the result being at the limit of significance in univariate analysis ( P = 0.059).
at the limit of significancep = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Regardless of not being statistically significant, the differences observed on the variables “existence of chronic diseases” (between groups defined by NEDA-3) and “anti-EBV IgG antibodies” (between groups defined by the “absence of MRI activity of disease” criterion) assumed p values at the limit of significance ( p = 0.059 and p = 0.055, respectively).
at the limit of significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Whereas the multivariable analysis showed a significant relationship between cremains weight and weight of cadavers (10.11; 95% CI: 4.93, 15.29; p < 0.01), and relationships at the limit of significance between cremains weight and age at death (−5.40; 95% CI: −11.09, 0.29; p = 0.06) and cremains weight and height (13.59; 95% CI: 0.03, 27.15; p = 0.05) for males. 4.
Cremation weights for an Italian contemporary sample.
J Forensic Sci · 2026 · PMC12766661
at the limit of significancep = 0.0661.3× alphagold
For the final status, we recorded significant negative linear correlations with AP ( p = 0.003) and ALT ( p = 0.033); a correlation at the limit of significance with BMI ( p = 0.066); non-significant negative correlations with TG ( p = 0.191), glycemia ( p = 0.517), SBP ( p = 0.260) and DBP ( p = 0.354); and a non-significant positive correlation with HDLch ( p = 0.556) ( Figure 1 A–H).