Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significance

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,270 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep=0.0541.1× alpha
Indeed, PD1 expression within total γδ T cells in PBMC correlated positively with parasitemia from placenta tissue impression smear and placental blood parasitemia (r s = 0.305; p=0.031 and r s = 0.283; p=0.046, respectively) and borderline significance with parasitemia from a placental tissue impression smear in IVBMC (r s =0.283; p=0.054) ( Figure 3 ; Tables 2 , 3 ).
borderline significanceP =0.0541.1× alpha
It is worth noting that in the basic model (model 1: HR=1.10, 95%CI 1.04-1.17, P =0.001) and the population school correction model (model 2: HR=1.07, 1.01-1.14, P =0.025), NPAR remained a significant predictor of cancer-related mortality risk in the population-adjusted model (model 2: HR=1.07, 1.01-1.14, P =0.025), but the association weakened to borderline significance in the fully adjusted model (model 3) (HR=1.06, 1.00-1.13, P =0.054) ( Table 2 ).
borderline significancep=0.0541.1× alpha
Active travel showed borderline significance in increases in transport mode satisfaction compare to car (OR 1.86, p=0.054). 4 Discussion 4.1 Main findings The aim of our study was to examine transport satisfaction with usual mode of transport, explore the impact of journey destination, sex, age, car access, urban/rural classification, health and socio-economic status as moderators of the likelihood of transport satisfaction, and explore any changes in transport satisfaction in these variables over time.
borderline significanceP = .0541.1× alpha
Tertile-based analysis revealed a nonlinear dose–response pattern: compared with T1 (2.0–19.8 mmol/L), T3 (24.0–51.0 mmol/L) exhibited persistent protective effects in logistic regression (Model 3 OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64–0.93, P = .006) and Cox (Model 3 HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.92, P = .003) models, while T2 (20.0–23.9 mmol/L) exhibited borderline significance in logistic regression (OR: 0.85, P = .054) but remained protective in time-to-event analysis (HR: 0.79, P = .002; Table 4 ). 4.