borderline significancep = 0.055
Education was not found to be significant in any study samples, whereas in women education was positively associated with perceived stress with borderline significance (b = 0.024, p = 0.055).
Education was not found to be significant in any study samples, whereas in women education was positively associated with perceived stress with borderline significance (b = 0.024, p = 0.055).
IMRT has been the most commonly employed RT technique in the treatment of NPC patients in Korea since 2010, and 48.3% of the patients in the current study underwent IMRT as iRT, who achieved better OS with borderline significance in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 1.02; p=0.055).
The associations of SD-TC and SD-TC/HDL-C with the risk of CVD events were similar to those of the ARV indices and conferred about a 10% increased risk; however, with a borderline significance for SD-TC ( p -value = 0.055).
In the middle-income group (1.3 ≤ PIR < 3.49), cadmium (OR = 1.32) had the strongest association, followed by lead (OR = 1.12, p = 0.042); mercury showed a borderline significance ( p = 0.055).
The 24-hour sBP was negatively correlated with MMSE score, with a borderline significance ( r = −0.151; p = 0.055), and positively correlated with the severity levels of DWH ( r = 0.177; p = 0.024) and WMH ( r = 0.158; p = 0.044).
However, the MetaSUB method obtained a higher 16S rRNA gene copy yield than Jiang with borderline significance ( P = 0.055; Fig. 2 ; Table 2 a).
By 2013 however, diversity was lower with borderline significance ( H s = 0.79, p = 0.055, Wilcoxon signed rank test), the proportion of closely related haplotypes ( P s>0.50) more than doubled, effective population sizes halved ( Table 1 ) and multilocus LD increased to significance ( Table 2 ).
This analysis shows a statistically-significant difference for gene E ( p = 0·035, Log-rank test) and borderline significance for gene N ( p = 0·055, Log-rank test).
A smaller, nonsignificant association of heptadecanoic acid with dairy fat intake ( r = 0.18) achieved borderline significance for the adjusted intervention dairy group × time interaction (3-mo net comparative reduction in reduced-fat group = −0.024% ± 0.012%; 95% CI: −0.049%, 0.001%; P = 0.055).
Borderline significance, such as P = .055 were regarded as insignificant.
The correlation between the MPV/PC ratio and OS revealed borderline significance ( p = 0.055) in the univariate analysis ( Table 2 ).
After addition of HALPz in Model B, higher standardized HALP showed an exploratory association with early neurological improvement (OR 6.292, 95% CI 1.226–61.424; p = 0.017), ECOG 3–4 remained unfavorable (OR 0.037, 95% CI 0.000–0.492; p = 0.009), and the rapid-growth association attenuated to borderline significance (OR 0.206, 95% CI 0.026–1.030; p = 0.055).
4.9%, p = 0.049), and borderline significance observed in the left femoral head (10.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.055) and sacrum (63.5% vs. 52.1%, p = 0.066).
In relation to age, the overall score of satisfaction showed borderline significance in association ( p = 0.055), among the components of the tool, the only exception was: “The extent to which the physician addressed your questions and concerns” with a p -value of 0.021.
For OS, an adjusted HR of 0.72 was observed, with a borderline significance (95% CI 0.52-1.01, p=0.055).
Additionally, the benefit for SCRT in improving LOTCA scores was seen to approach borderline significance in both pre- and postpubertal individuals (prepubertal—difference in slope: 1.34, P = .055; postpubertal—difference in slope: 1.09, P = .066).
In adult females, for each one-unit increase in systolic blood pressure, the odds ratio of obesity increased 1.026 times (95% CI, 1.010–1.043, p = 0.002), but diastolic blood pressure had an odds ratio of 1.021 for obesity, indicating borderline significance but not a definitive effect ( p = 0.055).
The multivariate analysis of the study showed borderline significance for SII5 ( p = 0.055).
However, UK research recruiting 379 patients (mean age 59.4 years, women 37.6%) revealed that the IDE-induced changes in the PCS in 6 months only show a borderline significance ( p = 0.055, Mean = 2.4, and 95% CI = −0.1 to 4.8) [ 31 ].
CEA showed borderline significance for good response prediction (OR, 0.57, P = 0.055) in logistic-regression analysis ( Table 3 ).
TP53 MB was higher in patients with ovarian cancer with borderline significance ( P = 0.055).
RPP-N had an increased length of hospital stay ( P = 0.055, borderline significance) and increased number of antibiotic DOT ( P = 0.032) than RPP-P.
In addition, high-dose PRT was related to borderline significance in LC in group 2 (2-year rate, 63.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.055, Fig. 3 B).
The number of digital examinations above the recommended had a borderline significance (p = 0.055, from 69.5% to 76.8%) ( Table 5 ).
Splenomegaly was the only factor with borderline significance (p=0.055) HR 3.4 (95%CI 0.97 – 11.9) which affects the DFS and TLC was the only independent factor that significantly affects the OS in the adult AML group (p =0.024) HR 2.2(95%CI 1.1 – 4.5).