“borderline significant”

Higher SPR was related to higher trabecular separation in adjusted analysis ( p = 0.027) and associations before adjustment were borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

Institutionalization showed a borderline significant negative association with anxiety (ß = −0.10; p = 0.055), while male gender was positively associated with anxiety (ß = 0.10; p = 0.013).

Of the chemokine receptors tested, only CCR6 showed borderline significant correlation with CCL18 (p = 0.055); its expression was highly correlated with T-cell presence.

Analyses of differences in seriousness scores between students and employees were borderline significant (P=0.055) in unadjusted analyses but were significant (P=0.03) in adjusted analyses.

Self-reported duration of SHS exposure decreased by 100% in Spanish venues where smoking was totally banned (p < 0.01), whereas a borderline significant decrease (from 8 hours median exposure per day to 1 hour per day; p = 0.055) was observed in venues where smoking was partially permitted.

Although borderline significant in terms of developmental arrest, a clear and reproducible sensitivity was caused by the brc-1(tm1145) ( P -value = 0.055) and exo-1(tm1842) ( P -value = 0.018) alleles.

Microsatellite instability was borderline significant as predictor of univariate improved OS in stage II ( P =0.055), but not in stage III.

However, the effect was borderline significant even after applying the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure ( p = 0.055), which suggests that scene stability may influence occurrence of cyber sickness and that the issue is worthy of further investigation.

In Group 2 of Exp II a borderline significant effect of CS Type was found [ F (1.09, 5.47) = 5.82, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.54].

Moderator Coefficients were found to be significant (QM(10) = 29.0311, p -value = 0.0012), however overall moderator significance was not maintained following Permutation Testing ( p -value = 0.062), with LFS only becoming borderline significant ( p -value = 0.055).

This difference was less evident in the pooled analysis of the Clavien–Dindo > 2 for which p value was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

On multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 3 ), increasing age showed a borderline significant positive association (OR: 1.018, p=0.055).

This difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.055).

Experiment 4: Complex Learning A Kruskal-Wallis-test showed a borderline significant difference among all species (df = 2; chi-squared = 5.81; p = 0.055) in the number of days needed to make 8 out of 10 correct choices.

Overall, the detection rate at the second round was 4.9‰ (62/12,582), with a borderline significant increasing trend from lowest to highest BD categories (2.0‰, 4.8‰, 5.3‰ and 7.4‰ in the categories 1–4, respectively, p = 0.055).

From July onward, all monthly positivity rates in 2023 were higher than those in 2022: July (RR = 1.677, p < 0.001), August (RR = 1.131, p = 0.055, borderline significant), September (RR = 1.289, p = 0.010), October (RR = 1.186, p = 0.010), November (RR = 1.249, p < 0.001), and December (RR = 1.594, p < 0.001). 4.4.

Further at week 10, a borderline significant change was found in extension force steadiness ( p =0.055), and a significant reduction was observed at week 22 ( p =0.011).

Although there was not an overall interaction effect between week number and excessive exercise for changes in SCL-5 score, post-hoc tests showed that there was a borderline significant interaction effect in week 9 vs. 10 ( F = 3.80, p = .055, ES = .04), and significant interaction effect in week 10 vs. 11 ( F = 7.26, p = .009, ES = .08) (Fig. 2a ).

Perceptual priming resulted in a significant difference in the mean RMSE for the wheat ranking test, (paired t-test p = 0.038), and in a borderline significant effect for the second rocket lettuce ranking test (p = 0.055).

The interaction by sex was borderline significant for milk (P = 0.055).

Calculation of AUC values indicated that only hs-cTnI levels at 12 hours had significant discriminatory ability (P = 0.013), although CK-MB levels at 12 hours were borderline significant (P = 0.055).

There was a borderline significant difference by gender ( p = .055) ( Table 2 ).

For SNR, the difference at the 2 electrode locations was not significant [ F (1,70) = 0.112; p = 0.738], the difference between age groups was not significant [ F (1,70) = 1.83; p = 0.180], the difference between the stimuli was borderline significant [ F (2,140) = 2.96; p = 0.055] and there were no significant interactions.

Their mean (SD) SSS-score was higher, 39.8 (16.5) points, which was borderline significant, P = 0.055.

Among non-hypertensive individuals, a high-risk TyG-AIP trajectory showed borderline significant increased risk (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 0.99–3.92, P = 0.055) compared to a low-risk trajectory.