“borderline significant”

A borderline significant difference was found in blast percentage ( p = 0.05), with more patients in the WT1 high group having blast counts ≥80%.

A borderline significant negative association with rheumatologic diseases was also observed (aOR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59–1.00]; p = 0.05).

After further adjustment for age, only a smaller putamen volume fraction remained borderline significant with an OR of 0.699 ([95% CI 0.481, 0.987], p = 0.050). 3.3.

Regional lymph node metastasis (N stage) More patients in the NEC group than in the IMC-NOS group had positive regional lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis (borderline significant, P = 0.05) (Table 1 ).

The interaction test between the treatment and time factors was borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

The analysis for item P3 was borderline significant, p = 0.05.

The Constant scores also showed more improvement in group S&P than group S at 2 years after surgery, but the mean difference in scores was borderline significant (13.4 vs 9.9, respectively; P = .050).

This trend was reflected in our meta-analysis, which showed a borderline significant reduction in the odds of requiring mechanical ventilation in vitamin D-sufficient patients (p=0.05), further reinforcing the potential respiratory benefits of adequate vitamin D levels in this population.

Results Compared to placebo, 2 days of metformin was associated with a borderline significant reduction in the free androgen index (FAI) (p = 0.05) and with a reduction in the serum concentration of LH-stimulated testosterone (T) (p = 0.03).

Excluding the patients that had no measurable CTCs, there was a borderline significant difference between median CTC count in the patients that did and that did not have HER2-positive CTCs ( p = 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).

There was a borderline significant difference between pre‐presentation and comparison intention to complete the test ( p = 0.05), with 66% intending to do so in the intervention group and 79% in the comparison group.

However when the child with severe neurologic impairment was excluded from these analyses, a borderline significant difference between the groups was seen in attention (0.32, CI, = 0.01 to 0.62, p = 0.05).

Analyses limited to births at tertiary care centers (excluding primary and secondary institutions) showed a borderline significant association between fentanyl use and lower tension pneumothorax risk (Adjusted OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01–0.99, p = 0.05).

The test for subgroup differences was borderline significant and associated with substantial heterogeneity ( I 2 = 74.5%, chi-square = 3.93, degrees of freedom = 1, p value = 0.05).

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) comparing the COVID >180 days group with the No COVID group.

We showed significantly higher plasma LDL and VLDL cholesterol levels and a lower V o 2max in FDR subjects after bed rest ( Table 1 ) as well as a borderline significant higher levels of plasma triglycerides and total cholesterol in FDR subjects after bed rest (all P = 0.05).

Among well-differentiated carcinomas, nuclear survivin was a borderline significant prognostic marker in the univariate analysis ( P = 0.05).

When using weight gain between six and 12 months and BMI as continuous variables, the same pattern was seen, except for only a borderline significant association in the multivariable version (βeta ( β ) 0.048, (SE), 0.025, p = 0.05).

A borderline significant relationship was found between LSM and age ( r = .34; P = .05).

When all inflammation markers, significantly associated with breast cancer, were included together in the same model (model I) the risk estimates remained similar (i.e., the effects seemed to be independent of each other), but the association was only borderline significant for IL-1β (p = 0.05).

Furthermore, the CT and TT genotype carriers had a borderline significant higher proinsulin/C-peptide ratio in comparison with the CC genotype carriers (est.: 1.25, p = 0.05).

After log transformation, the means for supportive PET/CT and non-contributory PET/CT were 7.4 ± 2.01 and 4.5 ± 2.07, respectively, with a borderline significant P = 0.05.

On the contrary, HbA 1c slightly increased in youth with type 1 diabetes in one study [ 25 ], both in the coping skills training group and in the control one (with no difference between the two), but this variation was only borderline significant ( P =.05).

Spearman's rank correlation analysis resulted in borderline significant correlation for IHC versus ISH ( r S : 0.625; p <0.05) and IHC versus microarray ( r S : 0.668; p <0.01), but in significant correlation for ISH versus microarray ( r S : 0.861; p <0.001).

Notably, the DFT cohort demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in PPI intake versus the JI group (I 2 = 0%, OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12-1.00, p = 0.05), with a P-value of 0.05.