“borderline significant”

Subgroup analysis indicated a borderline significant benefit for the FMR+ablative fractional laser (AFL) combination (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 0.99-7.71, p=0.05) but not for FMR+non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL).

After adjustment for sex, age, and eGFR, corrected calcium, inorganic phosphate CRP, diuretic use model, systolic blood pressure, and history of hypertension (model 4), the association between the highest FGF23 tertile and LVH Association between the highest FGF23 and LVH was found to be borderline significant (P = 0.05).

Interventions Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrated a borderline significant association with recurrence ( p = 0.050).

Smedman and Vessby [ 15 ] reported a borderline significant (P = 0.05) reduction in the percent body fat of normal weight subjects fed CLA (4.2 g/d for 12 weeks) as compared to the placebo group.

A borderline significant relationship was found between LSM and age ( r = .34; P = .05).

The cross-level interaction between depressive symptoms and positive events on PA was borderline significant ( B = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p = 0.05).

During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

The pooled analysis showed a borderline significant improvement in walking distance with RV pacing compared to BiV pacing (MD: 10.32 m [95% CI: −0.06 to 20.71]; p = 0.05; I2 = 0%; Fig. 2 c).

The primary endpoint, a reduction in DGF from 26.5 to 20.8%, was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05) when one-sided statistical tests were used in the analysis.

Furthermore, the CT and TT genotype carriers had a borderline significant higher proinsulin/C-peptide ratio in comparison with the CC genotype carriers (est.: 1.25, p = 0.05).

The four-way interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

There is a borderline significant difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (U = −10.00, p = 0.05).

Considering distal tibial microarchitectural changes, responders showed a borderline significant increase in Ct.Ar (+6%, p = 0.050) and a trend toward increased Ct.Th (+5%, p = 0.060) over 12 months.

The heterozygotes for this SNP were also less likely to develop pleural plaques (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.37-1.00, P = 0.05), the results were borderline significant after age adjustment (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.37-1.00, P = 0.05).

Importantly, the Charlson Comorbidity Index showed a borderline significant association with longer antibiotic duration (β = 4.57, 95% CI: −0.05 to 9.20, p = 0.05). 3.6.

The meta-analysis revealed a statistically borderline significant reduction in postoperative IOP favoring the AADI at 3 months (mean difference [MD] = −2.74, p =0.05).

In addition, the difference among various plant types in the greenhouse was significant for pod setting ( F 4, 45 = 2.906, P = 0.032) and seed number ( F 4, 45 = 4.109, P = 0.006), while above-ground biomass was only borderline significant ( F 4, 45 = 2.573, P = 0.050).

Egger's tests were borderline significant ( P = 0.05) or statistically significant ( P = 0.03), respectively. discussion The present systematic literature review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies clearly supports that, in breast cancer survivors, higher BMI is consistently associated with lower overall and breast cancer survival, regardless of when BMI is ascertained.

This result was borderline significant ( p = 0.05), and therefore should be interpreted with caution, as it may reflect a trend rather than a definitive difference.

PRDX1 protein expression correlated with smaller tumor size ( P = 0.011), low tumor grade ( P = 0.002), negative Ki67 status ( P = 0.004) and lobular subtype ( P = 0.003), whilst there was a borderline significant correlation with positive ER status ( P = 0.05).

Demands and social support from leaders as well as colleagues were significantly associated with RTW after adjustment for age, gender, and occupational position whereas the predictability and rewards were only borderline significant (0.1 > P > 0.05) (data not shown).

A borderline significant increase of the risk of all‐cause mortality was observed with PAD as compared to side‐clamp OPCAB: RR (95% CI): 1.46 (1.00–2.13); P =0.05; I 2 =0%.

One test assessing executive functioning, Category Switching, was borderline significant, p = 0.050.

Controlling for average distance to health facility, number of antenatal care visits, education of women, and parity, planning to save money was associated with giving birth with the assistance of a skilled provider, although the association was borderline significant (p=0.05).

However, within the combined FTLD cohort, the presence of any alteration in pain or temperature responsiveness was significantly associated with atrophy of right mid insula (and borderline significant also for right posterior insula) when thresholded at P < 0.05 FWE after correction within the prespecified anatomical region of interest; no significant grey matter associations were identified for pain symptoms or for temperature symptoms separately, at the prescribed threshold.