“borderline significant”

The four-way interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

However, catecholamine status at the ET was borderline significant for OS ( P = .05; Fig 3 J).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

We found borderline significant correlation between the electroneurographic quotient and hypertension ( p = 0.050).

Calibration assessment using logistic regression showed borderline significant underprediction of the true probabilities of non-arterial sample type overall (intercept = 0.31, p = 0.05), with mild underconfidence in predictions (slope 1.24, p < 0.01).

There was a negative borderline significant association between temperature and TIH risk (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56–1.00, p = 0.05).

Regional lymph node metastasis (N stage) More patients in the NEC group than in the IMC-NOS group had positive regional lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis (borderline significant, P = 0.05) (Table 1 ).

In chronic patients (7 trials, N = 194), the MD was 2.20 points (95% CI -0.01 to 4.40), an effect that was borderline significant ( p = 0.05), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).

In patients with EoE, we observed a moderate inverse correlation between FLIP diameter and PEESS Child Dysphagia (r=‐0.34, p=0.015) and borderline significant weak‐moderate inverse trend between FLIP diameter and PEESS Parent Dysphagia (r=‐0.27, p=0.05).

BMP10 showed a borderline significant protective association in the model adjusted for age and sex (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–1.00, P = 0.050) ( Table 7 , Figure 1 , Panel C).

Lifestyle factors also differed between groups: dietary frequency and sleep duration showed significant differences (both P < .001), and physical activity differed marginally ( P = .05, borderline significant).

There was a significant decrease in the reporting of neonatal sepsis ( p = 0.01) in the bivariate analysis, which remained only borderline significant in the multivariate model ( p = 0.05).

Results showed no significant relations between mothers’ prenatal socioeconomic or social support adversity and offspring’s parasympathetic nervous system trajectories, but there was a statistically significant relationship between social support adversity and offspring’s heart rate trajectories (p<.05) and a borderline significant relationship between socioeconomic adversity and offspring’s sympathetic nervous system trajectories (p = .05).

RT+HMB produced modest and borderline significant improvements in handgrip strength (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.00–0.48; p = 0.05) and moderate benefits in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores (SMD 0.54; 95% CI 0.12–0.95; p = 0.01).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

However, only a borderline significant association was observed between very preterm neonates and controls (adjusted OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03–3.19; P = 0.050).

Atrial fibrillation showed a borderline significant association with the end stage (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.00–7.55, p -value = 0.050).

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

The OR at NPAR ≥ 0.92 remains at the borderline significant level ( P = 0.050), but the overall analysis does not support the existence of a threshold effect.

This difference between the experimental and the control group was borderline significant (OR 3.54, P = 0.05, 95% CI 0.97–12.59), indicating that implementation intentions might have had a positive effect on the number of participants with vitamin D at home. 3.4.

For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).

PSA was borderline significant and a positive trend was observed for the presence of atypia and age at time of the index biopsy (all P > 0.05).

Again, we observe a slight, borderline significant excess of the first category (219 vs. 185, Binomial Sign test P = 0.05), suggesting that D. persimilis and North American D. ps. pseudoobscura share more derived bases.

Despite substantial heterogeneity across studies ( I 2 = 80.0%, p < 0.00001), the pooled effect size indicated a borderline significant change in stress (SMD = 0.230, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.460, p = 0.050).

One-way ANOVA revealed a borderline significant difference in evaluator ratings across Bethesda categories ( P = .05), with a small to moderate effect size (η2 = 0.09), suggesting a potential trend in consistency ratings.