“borderline significant”

This score showed a borderline significant difference between patients with AFVD (mean ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.12) and controls ( P = 0.05).

There were borderline significant differences in associations between blood lead and PTA when we compared Mexican-Americans with non-Hispanic whites ( p = 0.05), and participants who were not exposed to firearm noise with those who were exposed ( p = 0.06).

There was also a borderline significant difference between refugees and asylum seekers for levels of pre migration stressors (χ 2 = 3.96, df = 1, P = 0.05).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

Exercise function indicators VO2 (mL/min) showed a borderline significant increase during exercise ( MD = 0.31, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.62, P = 0.05), while no significant improvement at rest ( MD = − 0.17, 95% CI − 0.56 to 0.21, P = 0.39).

There was a borderline significant 1.7-fold increase in mean Errα mRNA levels (95% CI 0.99 to 2.49; p = 0.05).

In interaction analyses, no strong overall evidence of multiplicative interaction between current BMI category and alcohol drinking frequency was observed (overall interaction p = 0.503; Supplementary Table S6 ), although one individual interaction term for BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 combined with alcohol frequency of 2 times/week was borderline significant (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.00–27.73; p = 0.050).

In multivariate analysis, SULT1E1 rs3736599 remained significantly associated (OR = 2.87; 95% CI = 1.22–6.91; p = 0.016), while SULT1A2*2 showed a borderline significant effect with gynecological symptoms (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.01–5.05; p = 0.050).

Clinical evidence, though limited by small sample size and heterogeneity, showed a borderline significant benefit favoring CBD for overall behavioral symptoms ( p = 0.05), agitation, and caregiver distress.

In the tSCS group, gait function measured by the WISCI-II showed a borderline significant improvement (Friedman test: p = 0.05); however, post hoc analysis revealed no significant differences at post-intervention (Wilcoxon test: p = 0.109) or at follow-up ( p = 0.109) ( Figure 5 ).

The OR at NPAR ≥ 0.92 remains at the borderline significant level ( P = 0.050), but the overall analysis does not support the existence of a threshold effect.

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

In untreated cells, limited or no HIV gag-p24 protein was detected across all cell pellets (average 0.019 ± 0.009 pg/mL, assuming a value of 0.005 pg/mL for all samples with gag-p24 below the LOD), while anti-CD3/CD28 induced an average 0.138 ± 0.070 pg/mL of viral protein, or a borderline significant 7.6-fold increase over no-drug control ( P = 0.05; Fig. 4B ).

CD63 and SORL1 were significantly modulated in accordance with changes in the microarray assay, and CASP4 was borderline significant (p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Moreover, the presence of chocolate ingredient had a borderline significant effect on AFB1 (p = 0.05) and a significant effect on OTA (p = 0.002), with higher percentages observed in SKUs containing chocolate.

Results showed no significant relations between mothers’ prenatal socioeconomic or social support adversity and offspring’s parasympathetic nervous system trajectories, but there was a statistically significant relationship between social support adversity and offspring’s heart rate trajectories (p<.05) and a borderline significant relationship between socioeconomic adversity and offspring’s sympathetic nervous system trajectories (p = .05).

The interaction between Immunescore and ProliferativeIndex was borderline significant in univariable analysis of the ER-positive subset (HR 0.68, CI 95% 0.46–1.0, p = 0.050) and significant in analysis of all tumors (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47–0.84, p = 0.001), Supplementary Data S4 .

On average NSW-S missed 11 prompts (32%) out of the 35 sent, with the difference between all the three groups being borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

Home O 2 use was borderline significant after adjustment for these additional variables (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.99 - 3.04, P = 0.050.) Figure 1 demonstrates a Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the home O 2 cohort with an overall mean (95% CI) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).

Demands and social support from leaders as well as colleagues were significantly associated with RTW after adjustment for age, gender, and occupational position whereas the predictability and rewards were only borderline significant (0.1 > P > 0.05) (data not shown).

Baseline correlation of CMR parameters and EAT EAT was positively correlated with LV mass ( r = 0.25, p = 0.01) and showed a borderline significant association with LVEF ( r = 0.2, p = 0.05).

In the multivariate analysis, there was a borderline significant risk reduction of 20% with increased activity (aHR moderate 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00, p=0.05 and aHR high 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, p=0.06).

There was also a borderline significant difference by residence, with higher HBV seroprevalence observed among urban dwellers compared to rural participants (14.9% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.050).

Pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak test) revealed significant differences between the TNL and TL groups ( P = 0.017) and the TNL and PTL groups ( P = 0.025) and borderline significant difference between the TL and PTL groups ( P = 0.050), demonstrating more distinct differences in methylation at this site between non-labor and labor tissues than between term and preterm tissues.