“borderline significant”

Paclitaxel did not reduce the tumour volume with the same potency as carboplatin, but treatment with the highest concentration (10 μg/mL) caused a regression of the tumours that was borderline significant ( p < 0.052) (Fig. 1c, e ).

The interaction between race and alcohol use categories was borderline significant in the total cohort (p = 0.052) and reached significance in the “healthy” cohort (p < 0.05) (data not tabulated).

After additional adjustment for vascular risk factors and time interval between MRI and gait measurement, high CSVD burden was still related to stride length, 3-m walking and duration of TUG test, and also borderline significant differences were observed in maximum swing velocity (β=-0.109, P=0.052).

Participants with diploma level of education were also more likely to report that they consumed “less healthy” takeaway food; however, the difference was borderline significant (β = 1.99, p = 0.052).

The interaction test was borderline significant for diabetes (P = 0.052) but not significant for sex, age, obesity, hypertension and protein intake (P > 0.29).

This difference was small and only borderline significant ( p = 0.052).

In the harmonised subsamples, a positive association between average global efficiency and latent sustained attention − borderline significant in the total non-harmonised sample ( r = 0.16, p = 0.052) − consistently reached significance across subsamples ( rs = 0.24-0.34, ps = 0.002-0.027), although the effect remained significant after correction for false discovery rate only in two out of five subsamples.

The mean difference in pre- and post-intervention scores was borderline significant, changing from 4.00±0.71 pre-intervention to 3.56±0.53 post-intervention (p=0.052) (Table 3 ).

A borderline significant result ( p = 0.052) was detected in the intervention group in increasing the availability of fruit and vegetables at home.

Secondary Outcomes Absolute RPF decreased significantly, by 15.83 ± 39.98 ml/min, ( P = 0.041) during dapagliflozin treatment, whereas the 7.94 ± 20.73 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 reduction in normalized RPF was borderline significant ( P = 0.052).

Respiratory infections in the treatment (non-placebo) cohorts of the STRIVE ENVISION groups rose significantly from 21% of the treatment group at the start of PERSIST to 29% after 144 weeks of treatment ( p = 0.039—by paired χ 2 test of proportions in a single sample) while pulmonary exacerbations rose at the same timepoints from 38% to 46% (borderline significant: p = 0.052).

A borderline significant association was found between atopy and any allergy symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 3.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI: 0.99, 11.1], p = .052).

When Cox regressions were applied separately to subgroup of physical fitness parameters, 12 min running test was borderline significant (hazard ratio, HR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.996–1.00002, p = 0.052) ( Table 3 ).

It is also noteworthy that the significance was more robust in the right masseter ( p = 0.023), while the left was borderline significant ( p = 0.052), providing support for a bilateral finding, albeit with asymmetry.

This was borderline significant in the total population ( p = 0.052) and reached statistical significance when separated by sex, with a preference for male Me1 KO offspring ( p = 0.0187).

As shown in Figure 1 , compared to wild-type animals, Tg2576 mice fed with standard diet (“vehicle”) displayed a borderline significant impairment of recognition memory ( p = 0.052).

The effect of carbimazole was borderline significant compared to the control group ( p = 0.052), whereas the effect of L-thyroxine was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

These patients had borderline significant higher hepcidin level at admission compared to non-transfused patients (26.9[17.2 to 53.9] vs 17.9[9.9 to 28.8]nmol/l, P = 0.052).

There was a borderline significant positive correlation (r = 0.242, P = 0.052, post-hoc power = 0.499) between the average RNFL thickness and the smaller/larger HF N95 amplitude ratio.

The PE analysis revealed a borderline significant main effect of Previous Congruency, F (1,18) = 4.33, p = .052, yet no significant main effect of Current Congruency, F (1,18) <1, ns , indicating that incongruent trials did not evoke more erroneous responses (M = 4.3%) than congruent trials (M = 3.9%).

Regarding PR, the worst outcomes were observed in the subgroup of patients with PR expression of 10%-79%, which was borderline significant for RFi ( P = .052, Fig. 3C ) and significant for OS ( P = .008) and BSCM ( P = .043, Fig. 3D ).

In an exploratory analysis, we compared change in carotid [ 18 F]FDG uptake in participants with (n=23) and without (n=79) a history of CVD and we observed a borderline significant interaction ( P =0.052) between treatment group and history of CVD for predicting change in carotid [ 18 F]FDG uptake (Figure 4 ).

lymphocytic) was borderline significant (χ 2 =5.92; P=0.052; Table III ).

Similarly, SOX2 expression was higher in moderately differentiated OSCC patients (71%), but this too was borderline significant ( P =0.052). 3.6.

The rehabilitation group showed a borderline significant reduction of 0.01 from baseline to postintervention ( P = .052).