Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 13,764 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP =0.0521.0× alphagold
We found that individuals with the rs1135519 CC genotypes had a significant increased risk of HCC than those with TT genotypes (adjusted OR=2.71, 95% CI=1.15-6.36, and P =0.022), while the rs9966765 CC genotypes showed a borderline significant association with increased risk of HCC when compared with the GG genotypes (adjusted OR=2.38, 95% CI=0.99-5.75, and P =0.052).
borderline significantp value = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Effects were borderline significant in the unadjusted model, but in the opposite expected direction (PR 1.58, 95% CI 1.00–2.52, p value = 0.052); they were not statistically significant when adjusted for SES imbalance (aPR 1.55, 95% CI 0.95–2.52, p value = 0.290).
borderline significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
In a univariable analysis, global stress MBF also decreased with increasing EDVI (estimate − 0.10 (ml/g/min) per (10 ml/m 2 ); P < 0.0001), but with multivariable adjustment the decrease was only borderline significant (estimate − 0.06 (ml/g/min) per (10 ml/m 2 ); P = 0.052).
borderline significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Respiratory infections in the treatment (non-placebo) cohorts of the STRIVE ENVISION groups rose significantly from 21% of the treatment group at the start of PERSIST to 29% after 144 weeks of treatment ( p = 0.039—by paired χ 2 test of proportions in a single sample) while pulmonary exacerbations rose at the same timepoints from 38% to 46% (borderline significant: p = 0.052).
borderline significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Although, in our study, the gene-diet interaction term between the SNP and dietary intervention on T2D incidence was borderline significant (P = 0.052) at P < 0.05, taking into account that we can consider a P < 0.1 for the significance level of the interaction term as suggestive of interaction when some criteria of reliability are accomplished [ 45 ], our study fulfill these criteria to avoid false negative results and we considered this significance level (P < 0.1) to conduct the stratified analyses by MedDiet intervention groups.