“close to being significant”

Though we still could not achieve statistical significance in this study, the trend for DDVDb b020 was close to being significant ( p = 0.113).

The variables of immune-related toxicity and IL-10 were also added, as they were close to being significant.

However, with a p -value = 0.09, the association between condylar base fracture and ORIF was close to being significant, suggesting a tendency to treat single condylar base fractures with ORIF, with 24 (58%) open surgeries out of 41 condylar base fractures.

Though the difference in physical quality of life was close to being significant.

However, insomnia had no significant impact on degrading care and physical restriction, although physical restriction was close to being significant.

None of the factors examined proved to be statistically significant, although two were close to being significant: living in nursing homes [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–3.66)] and increasing age [aOR: 1.04 (95% CI 0.99–1.10)]. 4.

Though some were close to being significant, the BFs were still in the direction of the null.

A PTV volume of ≥ 35 cc (HR = 2.78 [95% CI 0.97–7.97], p = 0.056) was close to being significant.

The decrease in incidence in the 2017-2022 period was also close to being significant in the Neurology Division and in the Ophthalmology Department ( Table 4 ).

Only in one species, domestic duck, second vaccination did not have a significant change in titre ( p = 0.058), but also in this one, it was very close to being significant (almost 0.008 difference for being significant).

These findings suggested that while PT remained largely unchanged with SGLT2i treatment, the interaction effect between time and group ( P = 0.087) was close to being significant, indicating the need for further analysis of the potential impact of group.

However, the association between IBS and PD was only close to being significant.

On the other hand, the p -values for left-sided lateral inclination and rotation, which fall between 0.05 and 0.10, indicate that while these results are close to being significant, additional research may be needed to confirm these findings.

Despite this, the results were very close to being significant, indicating that further studies with larger sample size are needed before dismissing the hypothesis.

To further clarify these specific differences, post-hoc comparisons using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test were conducted as previously decided, revealing that Delta brain activity was significantly higher with the ‘Mother’ facilitator compared to ‘Elena’ (M = 575.92, p = 0.002), ‘Kyriakos’ (M = 409.96, p = 0.025), and ‘Father’ (M = 313.55, p = 0.085) – although for this latter coming quite close to being significant.

The ln_county coefficient is 0.0699656, and the P-value is 0.089, indicating that it is close to being significant at the 10% level.

The first was not significant, once adjusted, whereas the second, coping strategy, was close to being significant, at the 90% level.

For example (on page 4), "In primary auditory cortex (MEG), there was no significant difference between values of foreground invariance and background invariance (p = 0.063, obtained by randomly permuting the sounds' background and foreground labels, 1000 times)." This test is quite close to being significant, and this might be acknowledged.

Only the comparison between TPS and tACS * 10 is close to being significant when compared to sham.

NPS3 (burning pain) was close to being significant ( Supplementary Table 4A ).

The results showed significant changes in the parameters of working memory (inverse digits), execution speed, emotional well-being, planning, personal relationships, and depression and were close to being significant in working memory (direct digits), cognitive flexibility, physical health, tension, and anger in the combined groups.

We must also point out that this construct, according to the statistical results in PLS-SEM, is very close to being significant, so we have to value it in a relative measure, since a new random application could obtain significant results.

However, total phenolic content does correlate to the reduction in lipid oxidation in the form of TBARS at day 7 ( Table 3 ), and with P-values very close to being significant for PV at day 7 and TBARS at day 14 as well.

Although the “Parental Stressors” factor does not correlate with the STAI-E7, the values do come close to being significant, which is confirmed by the criterion variable of perceived anxiety that is included in the study.

Second, when the treatment effect was significant (or close to being significant), we performed Tukey’s multiple comparison test.