Barely Significant
← all phrases

close to being statistically significant

75 sentences · 75 papers · 259 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.055

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The difference between the two groups was close to being statistically significant, with an unadjusted between-group difference of −0.36 (95% CI, −0.71 to −0.01; P = 0.041) and an adjusted between-group difference of −0.34 (95% CI, −0.69 to 0.01; P = 0.053) ( Supplementary Table S7 ).
For both the facility-based and home-based samples, there were no statistically-significant differences between control and NIVR groups for age, gender, or body mass index, although the difference between groups for BMI was close to being statistically significant (p=0.05) for the home-based sample, with the NIVR group having a larger BMI.
20 Though our study did not find a statistically significant increase in the Knowledge and Screening content domain between the pre- and post-test, the result was very close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.0506), which indicates the result was trending toward significance.
It is worth noting that post-HABIT internalized shame score came very close to being statistically significant (post-HABIT Perceived Stigma Internalized Shame score is not a significant predictor of post-HABIT Perceived Stress, B = 0.1.072[−0.019, 2.163], t = 2.012, p = 0.054).
31 Among the included patients (Table 1 ), a higher percentage of patients underwent nerve‐sparing surgery in the EPE group (53.5%) than in the non‐EPE group (42.6%), and this relationship was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.057).
In logistic regression analysis, years in the profession were close to being statistically significant, where more than ten years in the profession indicated an increased probability of disagreeing with the statement (cOR 1.42; CI 0.98–2.07; n = 690; p = 0.064).
When recruited to this study, ART status was close to being statistically significant, associated with viral suppression, with those previously treated were less likely to achieve viral suppression ( p = .07) (Table S4 ). 5.
The association between low social support and the presence of depressive symptoms was close to being statistically significant (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 0.93–10.36; p = 0.07), possibly due to the low number of patients with a PHQ-9 score ≥10.