“close to being statistically significant”

Moreover, in our study, the sensitivity of IIC also improved with tumor stage from 17% for T1 staged tumors to 50% for T3 staged tumors; the difference was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.087).

The interaction N100*group is also close to being statistically significant (F = 2.70, p = 0.087).

Additionally, it seems that bike-sharing users demanding the improvement of bike infrastructure (e.g., extending current bike lanes) would be willing to pay more in a statistically significant way since this result is close to being statistically significant (p-value = 0.096).

However, an overall trend for slower peak growth rate of wings in species nesting higher above ground was apparent, as in addition to the three relationships being statistically significant, further four were close to being statistically significant (with p < 0.1; Tables S11 and S12 in Additional File 1 ).

However, Model 2 and Model 3 in Table 8 show that both IST P (correct) and IST Accuracy approach providing additional explanation of variation in the avoidance of rational thinking errors and are close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.1027 and p = 0.1063, respectively).

In the positive CK7 prediction group, OS was also poorer than negative prediction group (P = 0.052), which was very close to being statistically significant and RFS was not good enough (P = 0.113) (Fig. 9 ).

Patients with aneuploidy had an estimated HR of 3.8 that was close to being statistically significant ( P =0.13, 95% CI=(0.6, 23.7)), whereas patients with elevated 4N fraction did not show an elevated risk of subsequent detection of HGD or EAC in this sample (HR=1.2, P =0.84, 95% CI=(0.2, 7.3); Figure 3c , Table 2 ).

However, this was only close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.14 and p = 0.23, respectively).

This small difference might be real, but it is negligible in magnitude and is not even close to being statistically significant ( z = 1.08, p = 0.274).

However, this finding was close to being statistically significant with the upper confidence limit just including zero (SMD -0.33; 95% CI, − 0.68 to 0.01).

Since the interaction for likeability ratings was close to being statistically significant, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were done to further investigate possible differences between participant religiosity groups.

group than in the placebo group (65.9% vs 59.5%) which was close to being statistically significant (p: 0.0651) and the difference continued to increase becoming statistically significant by D84 (90.9% vs 72.5%;p: 0.0114) (Fig. 7 ).

In our study, although no relation was found between cisplatin dose (cumulative cisplatin dose >435 mg) and SNHL, this relationship was close to being statistically significant.

These changes are close to being statistically significant with p-values of 0.09 and 0.05.

The only variable that came close to being statistically significant was age, but it still failed to meet the nominal alpha level.

The genotypes of rs3181098 were close to being statistically significant (GG vs.

None of the differences between treatment and comparison state participants are statistically significantly different from the null in these analyses, but the point estimates for vaccination uptake are in the positive direction and are close to being statistically significant in the models for vaccination uptake a first follow-up.

33.3%) and were 2 times more likely to develop ED (OR: 2.00, 95%CI: 0.982–4.08, p = 0.055), although these differences were close to being statistically significant.

Although the data collected in this study are preliminary, the results indicate that music has a positive effect on perceptual variables such as motivation and perceived exertion, even if the latter effect only came close to being statistically significant.

44 - 48 Some variables reported in previous studies to be a prognostic factor of Barthel Index at discharge, such as time from stroke, 49 functional independence, 37 and orientation, 50 were only close to being statistically significant in our analysis.

As shown in Table 9 , raised risks were observed in all age-at-risk groups, although only for the 65+ age-at-risk group was the relative risk close to being statistically significant greater than 1 (RR = 2.04 (95% CI 0.96, 4.35) after adjustment for chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), based on 15 cases among irradiated patients.

It is possible that this contributed to the lack of any relations of retinal variables to cognition in our sample, although effect sizes were small ( β range −.213 to .000), and with the exception of AFv, none of these effects were close to being statistically significant after adjustment for FDR.

11 29 34 Analyses showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bacteriuria (pooled OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.01; p=0.06), noting this was close to being statistically significant.

Another two results: 50-meter Sprint ( p = 0.097, d = 0.5) and Grip Strength ( p = 0.077) were close to being statistically significant.

GDF-15 (ln-transformed) was not significantly associated with overall survival, neither in simple analysis nor after adjustment for these predictors; however, the association was close to being statistically significant ( Table 5 ).