Although MANOVA indicated that the difference was not statistically significant [F(10, 9) = 2.91, Wilks’ Lambda = 0.23, p = 0.06], it was close to being statistically significant.
← all phrases
“close to being statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.055
In the literature
Cholesterol (chol200) levels were lowered in the CAD group (147.1 ± 44.9) compared to the Non-CAD group (162.3 ± 35.8), with a p -value of 0.0531, which is close to being statistically significant.
However, because the p value was close to being statistically significant, these data may suggest a tendency toward mutations in exon 7 in the HIV group.
None of the interaction effects between pseudowords and facial expressions were even close to being statistically significant.
The pre-treatment leptin concentrations were close to being statistically significant.
Despite such a huge crossover in first line comparison, a numerical advantage close to being statistically significant was yet achieved.
Trial number was weak and not even close to being statistically significant.
Fourth, an explanation for the statistical differences in the age-stratified analyses might be due to statistical power, where more workers <50 years are lifting for 1⁄2 and 3⁄4 of the workday than workers ≥50 years, and the lower CI is close to being statistically significant among workers <50 years lifting 3⁄4 of the workday.
Additionally, the volume loss of the caudate nucleus, putamen and amygdala was close to being statistically significant.
However, some parameters (lipoperoxides, protein carbonyls, and activity of paraoxonase A) have p -values that are close to being statistically significant, indicating a possible trend that warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.
Although no statistically significant sex-based difference was found, it was close to being statistically significant.
WOMAC scores also come close to being statistically significant at 6 months.
P-value for the change in SYS due to driving was 0.051 between the two groups, very close to being statistically significant.
Global Trait EI, Well‐being, and Emotionality also came close to being statistically significant, suggesting possible trends that may become clearer with larger sample sizes.
While the estimated coefficients fluctuate around zero for the different specifications, none of them is close to being statistically significant at the 5% level.
This is also reflected in the distributions of 3 & 4-loops (Figure 3 B right top), and the distributions for feed-forward 3 & 4-loops (FFL 3&4 Figure 3 B right bottom), for this last one the p-value is very close to being statistically significant.
Many differences in associations were close to being statistically significant, which could have been achieved by recruiting a larger sample of subjects.
Hearing acuity was close to being statistically significant.
13 Similar to findings from a Spanish study, for patients aged 3 years or younger, the correlation between subjects’ scores in the food anxiety domain and FAIM-PF scores was close to being statistically significant with a P value of 0.088, while only EI and SDL domain scores were positively associated with FAIM-PF scores. 15 Significant correlations between K-FAQLQ-PF and FAIM-PF outcomes were observed in the age groups of 4–6-year-olds and 7–12-year-olds in this study.
The remaining predictors did not perform as well, and none was even close to being statistically significant in explaining the distribution of SSAFA recipients.
A marked decrease, close to being statistically significant, was observed also in IH milk yield and milk urea.
Three RCTs showed that in the hMG subgroup, the PPOS protocol led to a higher clinical pregnancy rate than the control group [RR 1.22 95% CI (0.99–1.5), I 2 = 0%, P = 0.06], and the difference was very close to being statistically significant.
Multiple comparisons between the injury risk mitigation pooled effects of the different IPPs and with the control group The findings of this second part inform that most of the IPPs exhibit either statistically significant effects or values close to being statistically significant (according to their upper 95%CIs that are approaching the value of 1) injury risk mitigation effects (overall, lower extremity and ankle injuries) when compared to their respective control groups ( Figure 3a,b ,e).
Therefore, some results that came relatively close to being statistically significant may not have reached significance, because of the small size of this sub-group.
The evaluation of fAGP and six tumor makers to diagnose malignancy indicated that CA19-9 ( p = 0.0019) and SPan-1 ( p = 0.0241) had a statistically significant difference in pancreas cancer but that no such significance was observed in the other factors nor in the other diseases with all factors even though there were a few exceptions that were close to being statistically significant.