Barely Significant
← all phrases

close to significance

460 sentences · 460 papers · 2,903 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Association between the burden of viral hepatitis and health expenditure Overall, an inverse association was observed between health expenditure and both HBV and HCV acute infections, with results close to significance for aHBV DALYs [-2.54 (-5.09 – 0.01); p = 0.05)] and aHBV YLLs [-2.53 (-5.09 – 0.03); p = 0.05)] in Greece.
close to significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
The comparison between SOTRs positive for any HEV marker and negative ones showed that those positive were significantly older; organ donations came more often from deceased donors, but this difference was only close to significance ( p = 0.05); between the two groups there were no differences regarding sex, region of residence, presence of comorbidities, type of transplanted organ, biochemical parameters and immunosuppressive medications ( Table 1 ). 3.2.
close to significancep < 0.051.0× alpha
Pairwise comparisons (using a corrected threshold for multiple comparisons: α′ = 0.017) showed that generalisation within aldehydes was significantly higher than within primary alcohols (χ 2 = 11.80, df = 1, p < 0.0006) and ketones (χ 2 = 9.90, df = 1, p < 0.005) and close to significance in favour of aldehydes when compared to secondary alcohols (χ 2 = 4.40, df = 1, 0.017 < p < 0.05).
close to significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
The correlation between DaT availability (putaminal z -score) and PCA expression scores was close to significance for the entire DLB-cohort, driven by a substantial correlation in DLB-DaT(−) patients (all DLB: p = 0.050, R 2 = 0.036; DLB-DaT(−): p = 0.029, R 2 = 0.216; Supplemental Fig. 5B ).
close to significancep > 0.051.0× alpha
Although there was a difference close to significance in leg strength in the collagen group, in general, pre and post-evaluations of all parameters in the collagen and placebo groups revealed similar results ( p > 0.05).
close to significancep = 0.0511.0× alpha
However, improvement with envelope expansion was close to significance for pairs differing by both place of articulation and voicing (mean difference: 10.2%; SD: 18.1%; t (31) = 3.2, p = 0.051) and for voiced fricative pairs differing by place of articulation (mean difference: 11.7%; SD: 22.1%; t (31) = 3.0, p = 0.074).