“close to significance”

As mentioned, the observed trend, though close to significance ( p = 0.051), could be due to the low power of the study and needs confirmation.

Furthermore, VAC small also affected disorientation symptoms ( Z = 2.10; P =0.036) but changes in the oculomotor disorder were close to significance ( Z = 1.95; P =0.051).

The difference in %AO by DCX between the ECT group and the DC group (mean=0.31) was close to significance ( p = 0.051).

Dose Response The fixed effect time by groups interaction was close to significance for the MI-CAT(V) total score (Type III p = 0.051) sustained by the univariate analysis of the Gr.

The effect of CSF phosphorylated tau on MoCA change was close to significance (t = − 1.64; p = 0.052).

Protein expression of cytokine IL-1β was significantly increased in response to Pam3CSK4 at 7 months and in response to R848 and 3 months, in addition to close to significance (p = 0.052) at 7 months, in supplemented animals (Fig. 6 a).

In a multivariate MR analysis controlling for dried fruit consumption, there was a direct causal effect of average weekly beer plus cider intake on OCC risk, with a p-value close to significance (p = 0.052) (Fig. 4 ).

[ 70 ] reported a decreasing trend close to significance ( p = 0.052), while Iaffaldano et al.

The difference in the number of modified and nonmodified individuals between the two antibody treatment groups was close to significance (Fisher’s exact test; p = 0.052). 4.

The chi-square analysis, with a Pearson value close to significance ( p = 0.052), suggested a non-significant trend toward the association of VR with improved outcomes.

The average Pearson’s correlation across all regions was close to significance (–0.25, p = 0.052).

Significant main effects remained, and the interaction effect was close to significance (i.e., p = 0.052).

According to the paired-samples t -tests, IFEROI values were not significantly different ( p -value = 0.15) from traditional organic (1830–1900) to intermediate organic-industrial farming (1901–1950), but differences were close to significance for EFEROI ( p = 0.052) and for FEROI ( p = 0.07).

ANOVA of target sensitivity (d') revealed that the main effect of Stimulation was close to significance [F(1,20) = 4.229, p =.053, ηp2 = 0.175]: patients performed at a d’ of 2.716 (SEM 0.430) during real tDCS and of 2.348 (SEM 0.414) during sham tDCS ( Fig. 3 C).

Finally, it was determined whether there was a relationship between the variables type of delivery and type of perineal tear in relation to the total score of CEQ-E 2.0, finding a statistically significant association for the type of delivery ( p = < 0.001), but not for the type of perineal tear, albeit with a value close to significance ( p = 0.053).

There was also an increase close to significance in iron concentrations ( p = 0.053; Table 4 ).

Thinning was also close to significance in the temporal segment ( p = 0.053, Supplementary Fig. 2 ).

3 a) and was close to significance with haemoglobin level ( P = 0.053) (Fig. 3 b).

The null hypothesis was clearly rejected for FSA ( p = 0.009) and was close to significance at 95% for GAG ( p = 0.053) and TSA ( p = 0.086).

The effect of g on the total LCD was not significant, although close to significance threshold (F(2.001, 30.009) = 2.174, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.038) and associated with a significant g *group effect (F(4.001,30.009) = 4.922, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.173) and no significant group effect (F2,15) = 2.542, p = 0.112, η 2 = 0.133).

The correlation between body mass index (BMI) and serum zinc level in CD was weak (r = 0.32) and close to significance ( p = 0.053).

However, at the 12M time point, while the SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + T cell frequencies were close to significance ( p =0.0534, Kruskal-Wallis test), only the CEF-specific CD8 + T cell frequencies were significantly higher than the non-specific Dextramer CD8 + T cell frequencies (p<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test).

However, estimates followed expected attenuation for Model 3, and p -value was close to significance level ( p = 0.054).

It should be mentioned, however, that the association between VMHC of the STN and inhibition LI was close to significance ( ρ 77 =0.22, p=0.054).

In the blindfolded sighted controls, the effect of scaling factor was close to significance, F (4, 124) = 2.40, p = .054, η p 2 = .07, and was best explained by a quadratic function F (1, 62) = 4.74, p = .033, η p 2 = .07. 3.2.3 Absolute errors There were no significant effects in the analysis with absolute errors (all p s > .24; see Table 8 ).