Barely Significant
← all phrases

close to significance

693 sentences · 693 papers · 2,903 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significancep = .0691.4× alpha
However, post hoc test (Bonferroni) didn’t reveal any significant differences, with only one being seemingly close to significance - GPT-4 performing better than GPT-3.5 ( p = .069), meaning potentially that the sample size is not big enough to catch small effect size of this difference.
close to significancep < 0.071.4× alpha
A Spearman correlation of numbers of respondents in each age range from both surveys showed a weaker positive correlation that came close to significance; rho = 0.613, p < 0.07, one-tailed.
close to significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Differences were close to significance in the unweighted model (p = 0.07) but became significant in the weighted model (p = 0.004), suggesting that AAA1 clustering corresponds more closely to zones with higher intensity of soil pollution, rather than merely to the number of sites. 3.1.4 AAA1 hotspots and years of life lost or gained To explore the link between AAA1 levels and life expectancy, AAA1 hotspots were compared with YPLLG values using a 100-m buffer.
close to significancep < 0.0701.4× alpha
The same could be stated for miRNA-181c-5p, which, although not statistically significantly dysregulated in the two animal models of AD, had a p -value close to significance ( p < 0.070) in the rat model as compared with APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice ( p < 0.748). 3.7.
close to significancep = 0.0701.4× alpha
However, the GLMM analysis indicates that the treatment did not have a significant effect on the mating rate ( F 1,42.1 = 2.22, p = 0.144), time was close to significance ( F 1,42.0 = 3.45, p = 0.070), but the interaction Treatment*Time was not significant ( F 2,42.0 = 0.52, p = 0.477), indicating that the pink colour was not relevant in mating success.
close to significancep = 0.0711.4× alpha
Our result of the one-way ANOVA to compare variation in wind speed between the two species when they produced advertisement calls is close to significance (Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 3.25, p = 0.071; n = 31; Table 4 ).