Barely Significant
← all phrases

close to significance

672 sentences · 672 papers · 2,903 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significancep = 0.0641.3× alpha
However, a correlative pair-wise analysis (Pearson’s r ) between the measures of Deambulation “event % time” and craving scores at post VR assessment timepoints, showed a significant inverse correlation with craving scores for basal (basal post; r = − 0.50, p < 0.01) and neutral (neutral post; r = − 0.4731, p = 0.012) and a close to significance trend for food (cue post; r = − 0.36, p = 0.064) in the VR-EE but not in the VR-NoEE group (Fig. 5 ).
close to significancep = 0.0641.3× alpha
A significant association was observed between maternal vitamin B12 levels in the highest quintile (≥81th percentile) and offspring childhood autism (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06–2.41, p = 0.026) and the association was close to significance in the lowest quintile (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 0.98–2.26, p = 0.064), relative to the third quintile ( Figure 1 ).
close to significancep=0.0671.3× alpha
To determine their impact on the surgery’s outcomes, they noted that a myringoplasty was more likely to succeed if the ear had been dry for a longer period; they have observed that every time it has been dry for less than one month before surgery, the success rate was 60%, and if it had been dry for more than one month, that rate goes up to 82%, and the difference was statistically not significant but close to significance level (p=0.067).
close to significancep -value = 0.06761.4× alpha
The expression levels of Syt13 were then assessed by qPCR and, in support of its putative role in determining neuronal vulnerability, we found that the FF MNs isolated from early-stage mutant mice displayed a strong, close to significance ( p -value = 0.0676) down-regulation of this transcript than WT animals (Supplementary Fig. 1B ).
close to significancep = .0691.4× alpha
However, post hoc test (Bonferroni) didn’t reveal any significant differences, with only one being seemingly close to significance - GPT-4 performing better than GPT-3.5 ( p = .069), meaning potentially that the sample size is not big enough to catch small effect size of this difference.
close to significancep < 0.071.4× alpha
A Spearman correlation of numbers of respondents in each age range from both surveys showed a weaker positive correlation that came close to significance; rho = 0.613, p < 0.07, one-tailed.