Additionally, it should be noted that the hemisphere × musicianship interaction was close to significance ( F 126 = 3.31; P = .071; η 2 = 0.026), suggesting a tendence towards a rightward AF in musicians, independently of segments.
Our result of the one-way ANOVA to compare variation in wind speed between the two species when they produced advertisement calls is close to significance (Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 3.25, p = 0.071; n = 31; Table 4 ).
SC3 inhibitory activity became non-significant with the double mutation although the decrease in Vmax was close to significance ( p = 0.071), suggesting that SC3 may have some activity on the double mutant Drp1.
Meningiomas were divided into grades I and II, and no significant difference was observed between them, except for IL-10, which was close to significance ( p = 0.0719), being higher in grade I when compared to grade II.
6F ) presenting significant differences between clusters (1.39e-03 and 2.55e-06, respectively) with hospital location coming close to significance with P = 0.072 ( Supplementary Table S8 ).
The live birth rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the STP group, differences between the two groups were close to significance (P = 0.072).
The interaction light × sex in the time to reach the illuminated arm was close to significance ( p = 0.072), with a tendency for males to respond faster than females when challenged with UV light (Fig. 4 ).
In the univariate analysis, NNAT and CYGB showed significant prognostic effects (NNAT: HR = 1.534, P = 0.016; CYGB: HR = 1.477, P = 0.029), and IGFBP6 was close to significance (HR = 1.368, P = 0.072).
When comparing the RPD percentages in the gait parameters of the affected and the unaffected limbs, the PLA group showed a decrease, i.e., clinical deterioration, in all three parameters measured in the affected limb during the 12-week period, which was significant for PVF ( Fig 3 ), close to significance for VI (p = 0.072), or not significant (DSP).
The Familiarity x Orientation interaction effect on RT was only close to significance (F(1,17) = 3.649, p = 0.073).
However, there was a statistically significant group × time interaction effect for total NK cells ( F (1,17) = 4.473, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.208) and CD16− Regulatory cells ( F (1,17) = 7.755, p = 0.013, η 2 = 0.313) and the group × time interaction effect for CD16+ effector cells was close to significance ( F (1,17) = 3.647, p = 0.073, η 2 = 0.177).
To explain which of the risk factors had an impact on pneumonia severity, a multiple regression model was set with 10 variables in Block 1, of which seven predictors were obtained ( p < 0.001), of which three occured significant: IL-6, CRP, obesity ( p < 0.05) and two variables were close to significance: D-dimer and lymphocyte levels ( p = 0.074, p = 0.073).
Association with spatial ability (H2a-b) The LMM on distance errors with 4MT-accuracy indicated a 4MT-accuracy × Viewpoint interaction (as predicted by H2b) close to significance, t (8547) = −1.787, P = .074.
The ERS analysis between amygdala and hippocampus was close to significance (summed t-value = 18.38, P = 0.075, n = 12; Supplementary Fig. 13b ), potentially suggesting that the information carried by more than one peak may be needed for the reactivation process.
The increased risk associated with lower Hb levels dropped to a 1.4-fold rise in progression risk, nevertheless showing a P value close to significance ( P = 0.075).
Direct comparisons of the hydration improvement between participants in the control and OS‐01 groups reveal a significant enhancement in the hydration of the upper arm ( p = 0.022) and close to significance in the forearm ( p = 0.075) on the subjects using the OS‐01 formulation.
Other age groups show positive estimates, with the age group 25–34 being close to significance (p = 0.075).
Figure 1 C), and similarly found a significant effect to the condition (χ 2 = 29.11; df = 2,146; p = 4.777*10 −7 ) and an SLC rate in the 5 mM PTZ group (0.2 ± 0.03) lower than the baseline (0.48 ± 0.04) in a statistically significant manner (z = 5.382, p = 2.210*10 −7 ) although the difference from the SLC rates in behavior-tracked controls (0.31 ± 0.04) was only close to significance (z = 2.229, p = 7.532*10 −2 ).
Although one-way ANOVA yielded a p -value close to significance ( p = 0.076), Bonferroni post hoc analysis did not confirm statistically significant differences between the groups.
5.59 (ng/mL), p = 0.007), while the differences between NET patients and controls were close to significance (5.59 vs. 3.67 (ng/mL), p = 0.076).
In the other levels differences in variability between species were not significant (USO4 upper: F = 0.71, P = 0.507; U04 lower: F = 2.35, P = 0.113; USO6: F = 1.97, P = 0.182), or close to significance (USO2: F = 2.99, P = 0.077), and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD only revealed significant differences in variability in δ 34 S between Rangifer and Equus in Level USO2.
However, the difference between TTP0.56 and TTP0.76 was not statistically significant, although it was close to significance ( p = 0.078).
On the other hand, based upon uncorrected p -values, significant differences ( p < 0.05) were detected in the precuneus and cerebellum (right hemisphere), while the superior parietal region was close to significance ( p = 0.07825).
Neither group showed a statistically significant treatment effect over time (repeated measures), though dAM+sBCL was close to significance (F(2,64) = 2.6348, p = 0.079, Table 2 ).
From this, it can be said that there may be a weak association between internet searches and ambulatory visits, especially when considering that the cross correlation was close to significance ( P =.079), but there is not evidence presented to say definitively that one predicts the other.