Post-hoc test showed that during the first 3 minutes, men and women benefited equally, but in the fifth and seventh minutes, the observed changes were greater in men, thus close to significance ( p = 0.0797, p = 0.0786), and in the last minute, the difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.0309).
With progressive uterine descent, none of the trendlines for the Control, POP-A, POP-I, or POP-V quantities of collagen reached significance although the POP-A group was close to significance ( p = 0.08) and had a positive slope indicating increasing collagen content in those uterus-vagina complexes that had descended further.
When comparing the age groups, the frequency of cat allergy in the 7-years and older group was found to have decreased compared to the pre-pandemic period, and the statistical difference was close to significance (p=0.08).
Gemma 2 and Qwen 2.5 inched uncomfortably close to significance ( P =.08 and P =.054, respectively), raising the possibility that model bias may reemerge as training corpora, instruction-tuning objectives, or deployment prompts shift over time.
After additional adjustment for potential confounders sex, age and copeptin, the association of BHB with eGFR was close to significance [B = 1.52 (95% CI –0.21 to 3.24), P = .08].
17.3%), also close to significance ( p = 0.080); in terms of nut intake, the proportion of “usually or daily intake” in the dementia group was 7.5%, which was lower than 16.6% in the non-dementia group ( p = 0.211).
Most pathologists recommended not to treat patients when they used “favor” compared to clinicians, ( p = .08, close to significance).
None of the factors were statistically significant predictors of the change in TSC and TMSC ( P >.05 for all variables), although time between analysis was marginally close to significance (coefficient 3.59 with P =.08 for TMC; coefficient 1.18 with P =.10 for TSMC).
But there was a trend of lower values in the IUFD group with a difference close to significance (p = 0.08).
Remarkably, differences were statistically significant in the RV + EV-EcN and RV + EV-EcoR12 groups ( p < 0.05) and close to significance in the RV group ( p = 0.08). 2.2.
The 24‐months RSMT comparison was close to significance ( P = 0.08).
We observed that the impoundment led to higher OM ratio in periphyton colonizing both substrates ( p < 0.05 for macrophyte periphyton and close to significance for wood periphyton [ p = 0.08 and p < 0.05 when RDCREF extreme value not considered]), indicating a tendency toward periphyton with higher organic content in the sectors affected by the flooding.
However, p-values were observed close to significance, with p = 0.08 observed, whilst the fitted slopes for both second and third dose were p = 0.13.
However, while in the DG and dCA2/CA3 we found an up-regulation of OXTR, in the vCA2/CA3 we observed a trend toward receptor down-regulation (statistically significant difference— p = 0.029 - in the multiple comparisons in Figure 5A —and close to significance— p = 0.081 - in the three-way ANOVA setting in Figure 2 ).
Since the co-efficient for this segment was close to significance (β = 0.006, p = 0.081), some confidence can be assumed in this trend of static high coverage.
On the other hand, participants in LDC trial reported worse sleep quality despite non-significance, values were close to significance ( p = 0.082) and may have a practical effect during practice.
In fact, the three bivariate Cox regression analysis with TNFRSF4 and the three clinical variables already mentioned have different behaviors: when including MYCN amp/no-amp, the model does not retain the TNFRSF4 variable although it is close to significance (p=0.083).
The correlation for sighted people for sighted participant was not significant ( r (23) = .06, p = 0.760), but the difference between the correlation coefficients of sighted and blind was only close to significance (z = –1.39; p = .083).
A Group × Cue × Quintile interaction was close to significance, F (4, 152) = 2.10, p = 0.083, η p 2 = .05.
The result was close to significance, H(3) = 6.667, p = 0.083, and with an extremely small effect size (Rank ε 2 = 0.005, 95% CI [0.001, 0.019]).
However, the interaction between temperature and compression cycles is close to significance ( p = 0.084), suggesting a potential combined effect that warrants further investigation. 5.1.2.
The direct effect of aerobic exercise intensity, included as a moderator variable, was not statistically significant but was close to significance (B = − 0.411, p = 0.084), implying that aerobic exercise might have a potential influence on cognitive function.
Antimalarial use was close to significance ( p = 0.085).
The main effect of the time point was close to significance (F(2,26) = 2.716, P = 0.085, η 2 = 0.251).
Although results close to significance were obtained especially in ACTH ( p = 0.085) and estradiol ( p = 0.101) hormones, these differences remained below the significance level.