On the other hand, the jump test showed statistically significant correlations with the Standard Progressive Matrices Subtest of the Raven test (r = 0.24; p < 0.01) and an association close to significance with the following WISC-V variables: balances (r = 0.16; p = 0.06), composite score (r = 0.17; p = 0.054), and Fluid Reasoning Index (r = 0.17; p = 0.054).
No effect of hearing status was found on the turn duration at low background noise, although the result was close to significance ( p = 0.06).
However, the comparison with the GA group was close to significance ( p = 0.060).
Difference between these two subgroups was close to significance (Chi2 = 3.41, df = 1 (P = 0.06), I2 = 70.7%).
Despite the observed group differences in simple effects, the time × intervention type interaction effect was not significant, although the p value was close to significance, F (1, 45) = 3.58, p = .06, η2p = 0.07, 95% CI [0.00, 1.00], ppc2 = 0.45.
Furthermore, in a multivariate analysis adjusted for participants' age, the finding of higher serum NfL levels in patients with IgG4 Caspr1 AN than in healthy controls remained close to significance ( p = 0.0609).
Necrosis positivity was observed more frequently in patients who died (50.0%) compared to survivors (17.0%) and showed a tendency close to significance (p=0.061).
In girls, the group main effect was close to significance F (1.99) = 3.584, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = 0.035: 1 − β = 0.466.
Notably, the vitamin B12 differences remained statistically significant even after the older studies were excluded, which supports a strong and consistent association, while the folate levels showed a non-significant result that was close to significance but did not quite reach it (random-effects model, SMD: 0.729, 95% CI: −0.032, 1.490, p = 0.061).
Finally, the Faux Pas C-C test shows a tendency toward improvement that is close to significance ( p = 0.061).
Close Contact with the Child’s Suffering: A result close to significance was observed (χ 2 (2) = 5.579, p = 0.061), with a small effect (Cohen’s d = 0.0953).
Intriguingly, the post-ischemia time points revealed that the PA/diet group had higher levels of 8-OHdG at 7 and 28 days, and that this increase was statistically significant when compared with the diet group at 7 days post-injury ( Figure 4 ; one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0199); it was close to significance compared with the PA group ( Figure 4 ; one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0619).
In the case of DHA, this happened because the negative (advantageous) direct effect was counterbalanced by a positive (disadvantageous but non-significant) indirect effect; in the case of EPA, the indirect effect was too small, and no direct effect emerged at all (although the total effect for EPA was close to significance, p = 0.062) (see Figure 6 and Table 7 ).
The ANCOVA analysis also revealed only one significant body size covariate, that being log‐transformed stature (Ln( S )), with an exponent of 0.769 (SE = 0.255; P = 0.003, 95% CI 0.263–1.276), although ‘age’ was close to significance ( P = 0.062) (Table 2 ).
In multivariate Cox regression model, adjusting T stage, N stage, histologic grade, hormone receptor, CD73 expression in TIL was close to significance correlated with good survival for DFS (hazard ratio, 0.13; p = 0.062; Table 3 ).
However, the relationship between the average hours of taking care of the grandchild per time (intensity) and the depression of the participants was close to significance ( p = 0.062).
Additionally, the interaction sex*diet in defecations was close to significance (F(1,47) = 3.662; p = 0.062), further decomposition showed that the F-UPF group had less defecations than the F-STD group (t(22) = 3.096; p = 0.005), while the M-UPF showed no difference compared to the M-STD.
The cytological examination revealed greater numerically estimated marginal means of the PMN percentage during LUT (4.9%, confidence interval (CI) 2.9–6.9%) than during FOL (1.8%, CI − 0.2 to 3.7%), which was close to significance (p = 0.062, Fig. 1 a).
We also assessed the fecal levels of butyrate at day 7 and found an increase of butyrate in mice treated with ARO112 close to significance ( p = 0.0625), which is the timepoint where treated and untreated mice show more significant differences in disease activity as well (Supplementary Fig. 6h , Wilcoxon test).
The Cu treatment was also close to significance compared to the C ( p = 0.0626), but for higher releases of PO 4 -P.
For subjective indicators, compared with the reference group, the risk of reporting a poor perceived health during the follow up was significantly higher in the low FA group (HR = 3.97 [95% CI: 1.85–8.53]), close to significance in the medium FA group (HR = 2.15, p = 0.063), but not different in the high FA group ( p = 0.706).
Each QoL additional point was associated with a reduction of 25 % in MH service use (p < 0.001); but QoL did not modify the association between comorbidity and service use, despite being close to significance ( p = 0.063).
While the difference was not statistically significant, there was a noticeable trend close to significance when compared to the unexposed/vehicle non-EBR individuals (χ 2 = 3.43, P = .064).
At ρ = 3 cm, the correlation is significant before correcting for multiplicity (p = 0.016), but it is only close to significance after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.064).
In addition to the higher genetic variance found OUT, the residual variances were significantly higher in claustration for FCR and TY and close to significance for RFI (P=0.064).