Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Outcomes of IVF Cycles Regarding the results of the IVF cycle, patients with DE and MIX presented lower estradiol levels at the end of stimulation, although these levels did not reach statistical significance, and a lower number of mature oocytes compared to patients without pelvic endometriosis ( p = 0.03).
It was also noted that the changes in several ABPM indicators of the ALI/AML group did not reach statistical significance compared to the AML group (except for changes in the daytime DBP between the two treatment groups, p = 0.0309).
Increased inflammatory parameters, such as CRP and WBC count, tended to be associated with smaller sEVs (modal diameter), but the association did not reach statistical significance for WBC count (ρ = −0.376, p = 0.031 for CRP levels; ρ = −0.342, p = 0.051 for WBC count).
For mBI, although the Friedman test indicated a significant temporal trend in the G-FMV group, post hoc pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (T0–T1: p = 0.031; T0–T2: p = 0.035; threshold p < 0.025).
In the present study, the effects of upper- and lower-body exercise trials on fat oxidation rates on day 2 were comparable, although differences between the lower-body exercise and control trials did not reach statistical significance (upper-body exercise trial: ES = 0.459, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.03, P = 0.031; lower-body exercise trial: ES = 0.436, 95%CI –0.03 to 0.00, P = 0.061).
Although the anteroposterior thoracic diameter did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis, it still showed a similar trend for PPCs in univariate analysis (OR = 1.763, 95% CI: 1.050–2.961, p = 0.032), possibly due to a limited sample size.
Although differences in AUC between Swin-T and ResNet34, InceptionV3, and ResNet152 did not reach statistical significance, McNemar’s test indicated Swin-T produced significantly fewer classification errors compared to ResNet34 ( p = 0.0328) and InceptionV3 ( p = 0.0304), suggesting a consistent advantage in practical diagnostic performance ( Table 3 ).
Although CHA2DS2-VASc score categories did not reach statistical significance, a 1-point increase in the score was associated with a lower probability of favorable outcomes at 1 month (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.97, p < 0.033).
Nevertheless, all these groups did not reach statistical significance except for the changes in CS OU from baseline to 49 weeks in the placebo group (0.85 ± 0.19 to 0.85 ± 0.08; p = 0.033) and differences of CS OS at week 49 between treatment groups ( p = 0.046).
μ static , Tps=120s ( Figure 3A ) at t = 0 d averaged 0.094 ± 0.008, and relative to that, at t = 10 d for F + MSC tended to increase (+37%), but did not reach statistical significance ( P = .033, α = .05/3). μ kinetic ( Figure 3B ) at t = 0 d averaged 0.024, and relative to that value, increased (+94%) at t = 10 d for fibrin and F + MSC treatments (each, P < .01).