“extremely significant”

*** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), * p < 0.05 (significant).

A higher CV TH may reduce the light available to under-story and mid-story plants in the forest [ 17 , 55 ], which explains the extremely significant negative correlation observed in Figure 7 c ( p < 0.01).

Accurate root cutting rate The results of the variance analysis for the accurate root cutting rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Notably, there is an extremely significant linear relationship between the accumulation of N and K in grains and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ); simultaneously, there is also an extremely significant linear relationship between K accumulation in stems and leaf sheaths and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ). 4 Discussion 4.1 Respon

The model R 2 was 0.9709, both values are extremely significant ( p < 0.01), which indicates that the obtained ternary quadratic fertilizer effect function is typical and could be used for statistical purposes and fertilization recommendations.

Furthermore, we found extremely significant correlations between ten bacteria and eleven DEGs ( p < 0.01, Figure 8 C), among which four belonged to Proteobacteria, including Plesiomonas , Arenimonas , Erythrobacter and Aquabacterium .

massoniana interacted with pine wood nematodes for 120 hours, the enrichment degree was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) in the extracellular region (CC), with 245 upregulated genes and 240 downregulated genes; cell killing (BP), with 23 upregulated genes and 1 downregulated gene; response to stimulation (BP), with 682 upregulated genes and 654 downregulated genes; membership (CC), with 562 upregulated ge

The results are shown in Table S3 , which shows that the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

There are an extremely significant negative correlation ( p < 0.01) and the most significant negative correlation ( p < 0.001) between omega–muricholic acid and allocholic acid and cholesterol, respectively.

There was an extremely significant difference in the infection rate of PCV2, both in terms of year and city ( p < 0.01).

Firstly, follicular cyst follicles had extremely significant lower E 2 , insulin, IGF1 and leptin levels compared with normal follicles ( p < 0.01).

In the experiment, x 2 , x 3 , x 1 2 and x 2 2 had extremely significant effects on the normal force ( p < 0.01).

Results: It was considered that there was a significant difference when the p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference when the p < 0.01 or <0.001 ( 26 ). 2.6.

Different lactation periods showed extremely significant effects on MFP, MPP, LR, MUN, and SCS ( p < 0.01). 3.1.2.

Soil pH and carbon cycling nutrients exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with soil multifunctionality ( P < 0.01).

* Indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time; ** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time. 3.

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

The mean δ 2 H was significantly different in rice crayfish, pond crayfish, and wild crayfish ( p < 0.05, shown in Figure 2 ), with the rice crayfish and pond crayfish groups showing extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01, shown in Figure 2 ).

Significance is indicated by letters: uppercase letters that are completely different denote extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01); lowercase letters that are completely different denote significant differences ( P < 0.05); identical letters indicate no significant difference ( P > 0.05).

Pearson’s correlation matrix for all soil sample counts (n = 27) shows significant (p < 0.05) and extremely significant (p < 0.01) associations between heavy metals.

In the BF group, daily feed intake showed an extremely significant positive correlation with TAN ( p < 0.01), except for days 21–36.

Significant correlations ( P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and extremely significant correlations ( P < 0.01) are indicated by **.

The reflectance of films A and B were about 2.2 times that of film C, and the difference reached an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

For particle size response, ANOVA results show that the model is extremely significant, p < 0.01, where AB and A 2 were important model items.